| Revision as of 22:29, 20 September 2006 editKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits →[]: resp to ColourBurst← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:35, 23 September 2006 edit undoTyrenius (talk | contribs)37,867 edits →[]: Result of debate - keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Keep'''. AfD is a debate; the earlier deletes seem not only less informed than the later keeps, but have not responded to the convincing points put forward, and this reduces the weight of their opinions, which would otherwise have resulted in no consensus. ] 17:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria ] 13:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria ] 13:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
| *'''Strong Keep'''. Very famous Singapore blogger. even has collumn in the Singaporean newspaper --]]</font>]] 12:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep'''. Very famous Singapore blogger. even has collumn in the Singaporean newspaper --]]</font>]] 12:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per Kappa. - ]''']'''] 13:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per Kappa. - ]''']'''] 13:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 23 September 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. AfD is a debate; the earlier deletes seem not only less informed than the later keeps, but have not responded to the convincing points put forward, and this reduces the weight of their opinions, which would otherwise have resulted in no consensus. Tyrenius 17:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Mr Miyagi (blogger)
Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria Neier 13:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. Page creator has also made vanity links from other pages. Leibniz 18:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Leibniz. How do you get the name "Mr Miyagi" from rugby? --Nishkid64 18:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn blogger. Danny Lilithborne 23:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
SpeedyDeleteA7No assertion of notability asserted. "Prominent" and "popular" are not assertions of notability. ColourBurst 23:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)- Yes they are. Kappa 04:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment "Prominent" and "popular" do not say anything. What did they do that was prominent? What made them popular? Nevertheless, it's contested here on AfD and so the speedy delete criteria can't apply anymore. ColourBurst 15:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- "Doesn't explain why" may be a good reason to delete, but it's not a good reason to speedy delete without any further examination. Kappa 22:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment "Prominent" and "popular" do not say anything. What did they do that was prominent? What made them popular? Nevertheless, it's contested here on AfD and so the speedy delete criteria can't apply anymore. ColourBurst 15:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes they are. Kappa 04:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep he was a columnist in a mass media newspaper. He resigned recently amid political pressure, in a controversy. He was already well-known in Singapore before that and, besides his columns, he is often interviewed and cited in newspaper. --Vsion 04:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, ex-legitimade journalist, and the claim of being cited in newspapers seems to be correct . More notable than Cyrus Farivar. Kappa 05:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, famous blogger as well, often appears in Mrbrown's blog and podcast. They both had columns in Today, and has lots of media attention. --Terence Ong (T | C) 15:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Very famous Singapore blogger. even has collumn in the Singaporean newspaper --Leidiot 12:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa. - Mailer Diablo 13:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.