| Revision as of 20:28, 7 March 2017 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,805 edits {{subst:uw-3block}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:16, 7 March 2017 edit undo128.40.9.164 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ] and violating the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> ] 20:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ] and violating the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> ] 20:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock|reason=I did not break the 3RR. I do not think the blocking admin even read my report of two disruptive users, before issuing this spurious block mere minutes later. Insulting me and lying about me is a very strange response when all I did was request a citation for contentious material. ] (]) 21:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 21:16, 7 March 2017
January 2017
Your recent editing history at Abundance of elements in Earth's crust shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Widr (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
El_C 20:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
128.40.9.164 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not break the 3RR. I do not think the blocking admin even read my report of two disruptive users, before issuing this spurious block mere minutes later. Insulting me and lying about me is a very strange response when all I did was request a citation for contentious material. 128.40.9.164 (talk) 21:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I did not break the 3RR. I do not think the blocking admin even read my report of two disruptive users, before issuing this spurious block mere minutes later. Insulting me and lying about me is a very strange response when all I did was request a citation for contentious material. ] (]) 21:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not break the 3RR. I do not think the blocking admin even read my report of two disruptive users, before issuing this spurious block mere minutes later. Insulting me and lying about me is a very strange response when all I did was request a citation for contentious material. ] (]) 21:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not break the 3RR. I do not think the blocking admin even read my report of two disruptive users, before issuing this spurious block mere minutes later. Insulting me and lying about me is a very strange response when all I did was request a citation for contentious material. ] (]) 21:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}