Revision as of 00:21, 23 September 2006 edit207.200.116.10 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:58, 23 September 2006 edit undoIxfd64 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators69,866 editsm Reverted edits by 207.200.116.10 (talk) to last version by Route 82Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
] |
|
] |
|
'''Interstate 895''' was a planned 6.4-mile-long ] in ] that would have provided a ] between ] near ] and ] near ], ]. This would have completed the partial ] around ] formed by I-95 and I-295. The roadway would also have provided additional capacity crossing the ] near the site of the ]. The new crossing was intended to be toll free. |
|
'''Interstate 895''' was a planned 6.4-mile-long ] in ] that would have provided a ] between ] near ] and ] near ], ]. This would have completed the partial ] around ] formed by I-95 and I-295. The roadway would also have provided additional capacity crossing the ] near the site of the ]. The new crossing was intended to be toll free. |
|
|
|
|
|
The proposed six lane freeway was meant to have two mainline interchanges (] & ]), and the terminus interchanges with ] & ] at a new Exit 46. Giving the freeway four total interchanges from start to finish. Once the freeway met ], there were plans to extend it as the ] freeway towards ] where it would meet the existing Route 72 at ]. |
|
The proposed six lane freeway was meant to have two mainline interchanges (] & ]), and the terminus interchanges with ] & ] at a new Exit 46. Giving the freeway four total interchanges from start to finish. Once the freeway met ], there were plans to extend it as the ] freeway towards ] where it would meet the existing Route 72 at ]. |