Misplaced Pages

Talk:G. T. Nanavati: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:06, 23 September 2006 editHornplease (talk | contribs)9,260 edits countercurrents: further← Previous edit Revision as of 03:39, 23 September 2006 edit undoBakasuprman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,844 edits countercurrentsNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


::Countercurrents exists to reprint articles available elsewhere. This is why I suggest you do a little homework on things before making accusations. The writer of the piece ''reprinted'' by countercurrents is ], a leading Gujarati Muslim. More to the point, the citation is not of an opinion piece. I can provide the Indian Express date of the statements by BJ Dewan, but that would not be available to everyone online.] 02:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC) ::Countercurrents exists to reprint articles available elsewhere. This is why I suggest you do a little homework on things before making accusations. The writer of the piece ''reprinted'' by countercurrents is ], a leading Gujarati Muslim. More to the point, the citation is not of an opinion piece. I can provide the Indian Express date of the statements by BJ Dewan, but that would not be available to everyone online.] 02:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

'''Reply''' - "Secular perspective" - Sounds quite partisan to me per ]. I'm deleting countercurrents, otherwise HvK and milligazette may as well be quoted.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 03:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


::This is also the third time that you have attempted to sarcastically quote something from my rather minimal userpage back at me. Please note that I am very patient, but you are only adding to a history of anger and disruptiveness that will come back to bite you if you ever get into trouble like Subhash's. ] 02:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC) ::This is also the third time that you have attempted to sarcastically quote something from my rather minimal userpage back at me. Please note that I am very patient, but you are only adding to a history of anger and disruptiveness that will come back to bite you if you ever get into trouble like Subhash's. ] 02:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:39, 23 September 2006

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Links

Explanation for revert

I am reverting baka's removal of my expansion of a section which he carried out with the edit summary "rm OR". Its not OR. Its directly from the rediff.com link you provided. For the 100th time overall and the second time today, Baka, at least try to read the links that you provide, if you dont want to appear a little inept. Hornplease 05:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

They are talking aboput the Sikh riots in that train of thought. Congrats on misrepresenting the links.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

countercurrents

Disqualified under WP:RS. Plese explain how articles like "Bush Wants A Bloodbath In Baghdad", "Reflections On Our Inner Bush: Corporate Monkeys In Our National House Of Mirrors ", and "Rise Up Against the Empire", indicate any sort of accurate and objective newsgiving. None. That's where "Pointy-headed academic argument" ends up in: Garbage dumps like countercurrents.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Even the organiser is more quotable than countercurrents.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Countercurrents exists to reprint articles available elsewhere. This is why I suggest you do a little homework on things before making accusations. The writer of the piece reprinted by countercurrents is Asghar Ali Engineer, a leading Gujarati Muslim. More to the point, the citation is not of an opinion piece. I can provide the Indian Express date of the statements by BJ Dewan, but that would not be available to everyone online.Hornplease 02:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Reply - "Secular perspective" - Sounds quite partisan to me per WP:RS. I'm deleting countercurrents, otherwise HvK and milligazette may as well be quoted.Bakaman Bakatalk 03:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

This is also the third time that you have attempted to sarcastically quote something from my rather minimal userpage back at me. Please note that I am very patient, but you are only adding to a history of anger and disruptiveness that will come back to bite you if you ever get into trouble like Subhash's. Hornplease 02:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: