Misplaced Pages

Syrian Observatory for Human Rights: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:36, 5 April 2017 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,559,077 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Expand section}}← Previous edit Revision as of 23:29, 5 April 2017 edit undoStickee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,599 edits why start a blank section? Also rv per undue and RSNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
The ], newspapers, and nongovernmental organisations say that SOHR is an accurate source. "Generally, the information on the killings of civilians is very good, definitely one of the best, including the details on the conditions in which people were supposedly killed," said Neil Sammonds, a researcher for ].<ref name =NYT/> The ], newspapers, and nongovernmental organisations say that SOHR is an accurate source. "Generally, the information on the killings of civilians is very good, definitely one of the best, including the details on the conditions in which people were supposedly killed," said Neil Sammonds, a researcher for ].<ref name =NYT/>


SOHR has been accused of selective reporting, with ] saying that they covered only violent acts of the government forces against the opposition for the first two years of its existence.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Massacres by Islamic extremists bolster Bashar al-Assad |url=http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Massacres-by-Islamic-extremists-bolster-Bashar-al-Assad-28219.html |newspaper=] |location= |date=17 June 2013 |access-date=8 July 2013}}</ref> SOHR has also been accused of reporting militant anti-government fighters among dead civilians,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/syria-contextualized-numbers-game|title=Syria Contextualized: The Numbers Game - Middle East Policy Council|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref> and has been described as being "pro-opposition"<ref>{{cite news|title=Report: Almost 6,000 Dead in Syria During Geneva Talks|url=http://world.time.com/2014/02/17/report-almost-6000-dead-in-syria-during-geneva-talks/|agency=TIME Magazine|date=17 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian civil war: Jabhat al-Nusra's massacre of Druze villagers shows they're just as nasty as Isis|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/syrian-civil-war-jabhat-al-nusras-massacre-of-druze-villagers-shows-the-group-is-just-as-nasty-as-10318348.html|agency=Independent|date=13 June 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian opposition group accuses rebel unit of torture|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-torture-idUSBRE9380VI20130409|agency=Reuters|date=9 April 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian rebels 'killed in army ambush near Damascus'|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-23600612|agency=BBC|date=7 August 2013}}</ref> and anti-].<ref></ref><ref></ref> It has been criticised for refusing to share its raw data or methodology.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/03/200000-dead-why-syrias-rising-death-toll-is-so-divisive/?utm_term=.0ecd5bd8d3f7</ref> In October 2015, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson ] questioned the reliability of the organization saying that it is based in London and has no ground access to Syria.<ref>. ]. Published 23 October 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2017.</ref> In March 2017, ] spokesman Sebastian Fischer criticized the credibility of the organization and called its findings "unsubstantial" after SOHR reported that a ] airstrike carried out on intelligence from ] caused civilian casualties. He went on to say that it is crucial to "take into account that those, who give specific information over to them , have their own interests consisting of this information being presented to the public in a particular way."<ref>. ]. Published 31 March 2017. Retrieved 21 March 2017.</ref> SOHR has been accused of selective reporting, with ] saying that they covered only violent acts of the government forces against the opposition for the first two years of its existence.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Massacres by Islamic extremists bolster Bashar al-Assad |url=http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Massacres-by-Islamic-extremists-bolster-Bashar-al-Assad-28219.html |newspaper=] |location= |date=17 June 2013 |access-date=8 July 2013}}</ref> SOHR has also been accused of reporting militant anti-government fighters among dead civilians,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/syria-contextualized-numbers-game|title=Syria Contextualized: The Numbers Game - Middle East Policy Council|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref> and has been described as being "pro-opposition"<ref>{{cite news|title=Report: Almost 6,000 Dead in Syria During Geneva Talks|url=http://world.time.com/2014/02/17/report-almost-6000-dead-in-syria-during-geneva-talks/|agency=TIME Magazine|date=17 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian civil war: Jabhat al-Nusra's massacre of Druze villagers shows they're just as nasty as Isis|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/syrian-civil-war-jabhat-al-nusras-massacre-of-druze-villagers-shows-the-group-is-just-as-nasty-as-10318348.html|agency=Independent|date=13 June 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian opposition group accuses rebel unit of torture|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-torture-idUSBRE9380VI20130409|agency=Reuters|date=9 April 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Syrian rebels 'killed in army ambush near Damascus'|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-23600612|agency=BBC|date=7 August 2013}}</ref> and anti-].<ref></ref><ref></ref> It has been criticised for refusing to share its raw data or methodology.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/03/200000-dead-why-syrias-rising-death-toll-is-so-divisive/?utm_term=.0ecd5bd8d3f7</ref>

==Funding==
{{Expand section|date=April 2017}}


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 23:29, 5 April 2017

"SOHR" redirects here. For other uses, see SOHR (disambiguation).
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR)
Template:Lang-ar
The logo of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
FoundedMay 2006 (2006-05)
FounderOsama Suleiman (Rami Abdulrahman)
TypeNGO
Legal statusNon profit
FocusHuman rights activism
Location
Official language Arabic, English
OwnerOsama Suleiman (Rami Abdulrahman)
Websitewww.syriahr.com/en/

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (also known as SOHR; Template:Lang-ar), founded in May 2006, is a UK-based information office that has been documenting human rights abuses in Syria; it has focused since 2011 on the Syrian Civil War. It is frequently quoted by major Western news media, such as Voice of America, Reuters, BBC, CNN and National Public Radio, since the beginning of the uprising about daily numbers of deaths from all sides in the conflict and civilians killed in airstrikes in Syria. SOHR has been described as being "pro-opposition" and anti-Assad.

Organisation

The organisation is run by Rami Abdulrahman (sometimes referred to as Rami Abdul Rahman), from his home in Coventry. He is a Syrian Sunni Muslim who owns a clothes shop. Born Osama Suleiman, he adopted a pseudonym during his years of activism in Syria, and has used it publicly ever since. After being imprisoned three times in Syria, Abdulrahman fled to the United Kingdom fearing a fourth jail term and has not returned.

In a December 2011 interview with Reuters, Abdulrahman said the observatory has a network of more than 200 people and that six of his sources had been killed. In 2012, Süddeutsche Zeitung described the organization as a one-man-operation with a single permanent worker, Rami Abdulrahman. In April 2013, the New York Times described him as being on the phone all day every day with contacts in Syria, relying on four men inside the country who collate information from more than 230 activists while cross-checking all information with sources himself.

Praise and criticism

The United Nations, newspapers, and nongovernmental organisations say that SOHR is an accurate source. "Generally, the information on the killings of civilians is very good, definitely one of the best, including the details on the conditions in which people were supposedly killed," said Neil Sammonds, a researcher for Amnesty International.

SOHR has been accused of selective reporting, with AsiaNews saying that they covered only violent acts of the government forces against the opposition for the first two years of its existence. SOHR has also been accused of reporting militant anti-government fighters among dead civilians, and has been described as being "pro-opposition" and anti-Assad. It has been criticised for refusing to share its raw data or methodology.

See also

References

  1. "26 civilians killed in Syria on Friday: Observatory". The Asian Age. 18 February 2012. Archived from the original on 11 June 2012. Retrieved 11 June 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  2. "Syrian Observatory for Human Rights". Syriahr.com. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  3. ^ Abbas, Mohammed; Golovnina, Maria (editing) (8 December 2011). "Coventry – an unlikely home to prominent Syria activist". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 June 2012. Retrieved 11 June 2012. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. "Report: Almost 6,000 Dead in Syria During Geneva Talks". TIME Magazine. 17 February 2014.
  5. "Syrian civil war: Jabhat al-Nusra's massacre of Druze villagers shows they're just as nasty as Isis". Independent. 13 June 2015.
  6. "Syrian opposition group accuses rebel unit of torture". Reuters. 9 April 2013.
  7. "Syrian rebels 'killed in army ambush near Damascus'". BBC. 7 August 2013.
  8. Al-Jazeera
  9. Haaretz
  10. ^ "A Very Busy Man Behind the Syrian Civil War's Casualty Count". New York Times. 9 April 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
  11. London, Jonas Schaible (1 November 2012). "Syrische Beobachtungsstelle für Menschenrechte: Ominöse Protokollanten des Todes". Retrieved 24 November 2016 – via Sueddeutsche.de.
  12. "Massacres by Islamic extremists bolster Bashar al-Assad". AsiaNews. 17 June 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2013.
  13. "Syria Contextualized: The Numbers Game - Middle East Policy Council". Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  14. "Report: Almost 6,000 Dead in Syria During Geneva Talks". TIME Magazine. 17 February 2014.
  15. "Syrian civil war: Jabhat al-Nusra's massacre of Druze villagers shows they're just as nasty as Isis". Independent. 13 June 2015.
  16. "Syrian opposition group accuses rebel unit of torture". Reuters. 9 April 2013.
  17. "Syrian rebels 'killed in army ambush near Damascus'". BBC. 7 August 2013.
  18. Al-Jazeera
  19. Haaretz
  20. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/03/200000-dead-why-syrias-rising-death-toll-is-so-divisive/?utm_term=.0ecd5bd8d3f7

External links

Categories: