| Revision as of 22:39, 27 September 2006 editDr U (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,563 edits cleaning, as nobody has posted here in 2 weeks← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:52, 7 October 2006 edit undoEquinox137 (talk | contribs)1,706 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Deborah Reed== | |||
| Hey Dr U, question for ya. How can Deborah Reed be a bigamist if 1) her husband abandoned her in 1724, yet 2) she was in a common law marraige with Ben Franklin starting six years later? That doesn't seem to me to be the traditional definition of a bigamist. ] 05:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:52, 7 October 2006
Deborah Reed
Hey Dr U, question for ya. How can Deborah Reed be a bigamist if 1) her husband abandoned her in 1724, yet 2) she was in a common law marraige with Ben Franklin starting six years later? That doesn't seem to me to be the traditional definition of a bigamist. Equinox137 05:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)