| Revision as of 22:14, 4 June 2017 editAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →Bad-faith vandalism accusations← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 4 June 2017 edit undoAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits restore pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | == Your ] nomination of ]== | ||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Bad-faith vandalism accusations == | |||
| '''This is your final warning.''' '''STOP''' accusing other editors of "vandalism" for making good-faith edits you don't agree with. You have been warned about this before, but you blanked the warning a few hours before continuing in the same behaviour. If you continue making "vandalism" accusations without evidence, you may be blocked. | |||
| The editor you reported on AIV was edit-warring, and ], both of which are inherently disruptive, but their edits were based on a fair assumption that the "£2 million pounds" thing is a rumour, and sources like agree. (You were of this fact before you filed the AIV report.) Your own edit-warring, removal of sourced content, and adding dubiously-sourced content is equally disruptive, but it isn't "vandalism". | |||
| Pinging ], who blocked Jojocc based on your report, but apparently forgot to remind you of the definition of ]. (Note that I don't think it was a bad block -- the edit-warring alone was disruptive enough to warrant a 31-hour block.) | |||
| ] (<small>]]</small>) 22:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :: Never said the word vandal in any of the refs you put up, no need to make stuff up. - ] (]) 22:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:14, 4 June 2017
A Barnstar for you
|
The Writer's Barnstar | |
| For your excellent work creating character articles for A Song of Ice and Fire. Keep up the great work! IdenticalHetero (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones
The article Game of Thrones you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Game of Thrones for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Peter Dinklage
The article Peter Dinklage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Dinklage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
True Detective
|
Congratulations, it's a... |
| ...Misplaced Pages Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC) |
Yay.. thanks for the review and all. - AffeL (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of True Detective
The article True Detective you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:True Detective for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 04:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Jon Snow
Hi, I made a few edits on Kit Harington's page. I saw you nominated it for GA. Great job! I hope to see it pass. Let me know if you have any questions. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. - AffeL (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Kit Harington
Here's my thought process. This is either a) Kit Harington, not wanting to publicise his relationship with Rose Leslie on Misplaced Pages, b) the reverse, c) a vandal screwing about. WP:AGF says we can't choose option c) if a) and b) are within the bounds of plausibility. If the IP comes back again, drop me a line and I'll have a look - if they're not prepared to communicate with us though, we can't do anything. Ritchie333 12:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Both Kit and Rose have been public about their relationship(See:(Min: 4.24) and ) If the ip user comes back, I will inform you. - AffeL (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if they've just had an almighty row and split up? Not that I would wish that to happen particularly, but sometimes that's just the way life goes. Ritchie333 12:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- They where seen togheter just a day ago at an event in England, as a couple, holding hands and kissing. So, I don't believe they have parted ways, Even if they hade, a source is needed to confirm it. - AffeL (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if they've just had an almighty row and split up? Not that I would wish that to happen particularly, but sometimes that's just the way life goes. Ritchie333 12:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- And they said romance was dead :-) ... okay, I'm leaning more towards option c) now. Ritchie333 13:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, in my warped imagination I have thought of d) a 27-year old bespectacled geek with suspicious facial hair who can't stand that that beastly Mr Harington had the gall to date the delectable Ms Leslie and decides to blank all mention on the internet to make him feel better. However, in practical terms that is close enough to c) anyway, and also d) is more likely not to be an anon IP, but an admin on Commons. (ooooh) Ritchie333 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hahah...Yeah, I would not be surprised if that was the case. - AffeL (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: The suspicious facial hair guy is back. - AffeL (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, in my warped imagination I have thought of d) a 27-year old bespectacled geek with suspicious facial hair who can't stand that that beastly Mr Harington had the gall to date the delectable Ms Leslie and decides to blank all mention on the internet to make him feel better. However, in practical terms that is close enough to c) anyway, and also d) is more likely not to be an anon IP, but an admin on Commons. (ooooh) Ritchie333 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Banhammered. Ritchie333 14:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333:. That guy is back, using another ip adress. Wow, he really can't stand Harington and Leslie being a couple. - AffeL (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Right, protected it for a week. That should keep things at bay. Ritchie333 18:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
References
- @Ritchie333: The sentence in question, as it currently appears, is clear WP:SYNTH. I don't know what edits you were referring to, and I am not the IP in question (nor Harington, nor Leslie), but I know the content you are talking about and I am not a vandal. Either (a) a new source that explicitly supports the claim needs to be added, (b) the claim needs to be removed, or (c) the claim should be rewritten to accurately reflect the content of the BuzzFeed article (that the "on-and-off relationship" was widely rumoured and it wasn't until 2016 that the two "officially" appeared together at an event as a "couple"). Note that I think (c) might be a BLP-violation and violate WP:SPECULATION, and (a) might not be viable as I don't follow celeb gossip "news" and so don't know if such a source exists. One doesn't need to be a vandal or a COI editor to reach this conclusion -- any editor who understands our policies would reach the same conclusion. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| This Special Barnstar is for all the hard work you have done on List of awards and nominations received by Game of Thrones during the last few months. Kingstoken (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Kit Harington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kit Harington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)