| Revision as of 22:52, 30 September 2006 view sourceCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits Make introduction more straightforward, keep "most areas" verbiage← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:58, 1 October 2006 view source Reinyday (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,425 edits I and others dispute that "This page is considered a guideline..."Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{disputed}} | |||
| {{guideline|]<br>]}} | {{guideline|]<br>]}} | ||
| {{IncGuide}} | {{IncGuide}} | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 1 October 2006
 | This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This page documents an English Misplaced Pages ]. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
]
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
- For the essay on evaluating notability, see Misplaced Pages:Notability/Arguments.
Topics in most areas must meet a minimum threshold of notability in order for an article on that topic to remain on Misplaced Pages. This is a necessary result of Misplaced Pages being a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia. The terms "importance" and "significance" are also in use, and for practical purposes on Misplaced Pages they are similar.
The guidelines shown in the table on the right have been created, or are under discussion, to set out more precisely what these thresholds should be. They generally assert that a minimum standard for any given topic is that it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, where the source is independent of the topic itself.
Articles on subjects with borderline notability are frequently merged into list articles (e.g. List of esoteric programming languages), or into an article on a related subject (e.g. articles about not-well-known relatives of a famous person tend to be merged into the article on the person itself).
Articles on non-notable subjects are nominated for Proposed Deletion and Articles for Deletion, and the article's merits are discussed, as can be seen through precedents. An article on the topic of a person, a group of people, a band, or a club that does not even assert the notability of that topic can be deleted without argument.
Rationale
- In order to have a verifiable article, a topic must be notable enough that it will be described by multiple independent sources.
- In order to have a neutral article with minimal errors, a topic must be notable enough that there will be non-partisan editors interested in editing it.
- Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. As such, Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate directory of businesses, websites, persons, etc.
See also
This page documents the status quo. There are (and have been) several proposals to alter the status quo, such as:
- Misplaced Pages:Non-notability, an active proposal to use only verifiability in regard to whether "non-notable" subjects should be included in Misplaced Pages.