| Revision as of 05:17, 1 October 2006 editFresheneesz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,055 edits Aribitration relating to NNOT and Radiant← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:24, 3 October 2006 edit undoParsssseltongue (talk | contribs)1,712 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| Hey, this relates to the above headers. I just put together an arbitration case at ]. Radiant has pushed notability on us without any clear consensus. Other things are also at hand. I would greatly appreciate your input. ] 05:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | Hey, this relates to the above headers. I just put together an arbitration case at ]. Radiant has pushed notability on us without any clear consensus. Other things are also at hand. I would greatly appreciate your input. ] 05:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==AfD closure== | |||
| I appreciate your notes, I am weighing them considerably. Honestly, the reason I closed it was, it has been going on since September 25. It seemed clear that there would be no consensus reached, and I felt standing by would delay the inevitable. But again, your points are valid and will influence my actions in the future. ] <sup>(])</sup> 23:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:24, 3 October 2006
|
|
 | I'm on Wikibreak for the immediate future. I'll still check my talk page off and on, but don't expect an immediate reply. |
Too empty!
Your talk page is too empty, so have some WikiLove!
-- Chris chat edits essays has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
-- Chris chat edits essays 03:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
WP:ASR
Hi there! I'm not very familiar with ASR myself, but I notice there's quite some other similar pointers in mainspace, e.g. Delete and Guideline and probably others. I don't really mind either way if you delete these or replace the one on Policy, but consistency is nice. And maybe adding a line or two to ASR would clarify for the future. HAND! >Radiant< 16:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
hi you deleted my posts
they wernt irelevent read it thoughly ok —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zerow00 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Copy of Genesis 1:1-13 removed for talk page clarity Ziggurat 03:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Dude?
Why can't you see the humour in what I am doing? Do you really think intelliegent people believe the bullshit written in this wiki? No they don't and would like another opinion on her. It isn't spam and it isn't advertising it is just another source on her/him. Leave it alone and grow up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iminicus (talk • contribs) 03:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
School?
No I didn't but I do have a sense of humour something you lack. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iminicus (talk • contribs) 04:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
slip of the ~~~~
You wrote:
It was in fact a slip of the ~~~~; second time I've done it in 7000 edits :) Ziggurat 02:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sure 'n begorrah - knew t'was so... I actually looked up your edit line scores; it said edit summary usage for Ziggurat: 100% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Not the kind of person who routinely forgets to ~~~~. Cheers - Williamborg (Bill) 02:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Notability now a guideline
A sad time for Misplaced Pages... although it was generally accepted by the community, now there's an incredibly subjective barrier of inclusion for Misplaced Pages. -- Chris chat edits essays 19:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Aribitration relating to NNOT and Radiant
Hey, this relates to the above headers. I just put together an arbitration case at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Harrassment.2C_talk_page_vandalism.2C_and_non-consensus_changes_to_guideline. Radiant has pushed notability on us without any clear consensus. Other things are also at hand. I would greatly appreciate your input. Fresheneesz 05:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
AfD closure
I appreciate your notes, I am weighing them considerably. Honestly, the reason I closed it was, it has been going on since September 25. It seemed clear that there would be no consensus reached, and I felt standing by would delay the inevitable. But again, your points are valid and will influence my actions in the future. PT 23:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)