Misplaced Pages

:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/taalo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:AMA Requests for Assistance | Requests Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:39, 2 October 2006 editTaalo (talk | contribs)2,149 editsNo edit summary  Revision as of 16:55, 3 October 2006 edit undoThe Thadman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,139 editsm Fixed formatting.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Wikipedian filing request:''' '''Wikipedian filing request:'''
<!-- Do not change anything here. --> <!-- Do not change anything here. -->
* {{user|{{taalo}}}} * {{user|taalo}}


'''Other Wikipedians this pertains to:''' '''Other Wikipedians this pertains to:'''

Revision as of 16:55, 3 October 2006

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Misplaced Pages pages this pertains to:

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer: Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: Abuse of power really.

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer: Tried to initiate discussions, but the problem is that this user is particularly tenacious and keeping his POV. That, and how can make things correct, when you have a majority of users that happen to hold for one particular POV?

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer: Help on dealing with this issue. Hopefully assistance in actually using the correct names for pages. For example, the Italian Province of Bolzano-Bozen (BZ) is now moved to South Tyrol.

Summary:

Discussion:

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

Case Status: Template:AMA case status

Advocate Status:

  • None assigned.