Revision as of 09:29, 3 October 2006 editKittybrewster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,052 editsm →Who?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:58, 14 October 2006 edit undoSandyDancer (talk | contribs)3,486 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
I have been on the continent so unable to visit Misplaced Pages. Back today. ] 07:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | I have been on the continent so unable to visit Misplaced Pages. Back today. ] 07:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Monday Club== | |||
Reading the above, I can see you've run into trouble before on Wikpedia for POV pushing. Your reversion on the ] article was unjustified. You can't revert properly sourced material just because you don't personally agree with it. And putting right wing in speech marks was frankly silly. --] 19:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:58, 14 October 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Chelsea Tory, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua 10:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Marxist
Chelsea Tory hello! You're more than right. 81.129.155.181 20:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I think your claims that a Marxist/leftist conspiracy is out to nobble the biographies of right-wingers are a bit misplaced. As an experienced Wikipedian and an administrator who's not been involved in any of the Monday Club-related articles before now, I've had a look at them with what I hope you'll accept are unprejudiced eyes. And I have to say that many of the articles are problematic - many of the subjects don't meet Misplaced Pages's biographical notability criteria (WP:BIO), the articles are stuffed with trivia such as who went to which dinner, they aren't referenced and they're not particularly neutral. Please bear in mind that Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- ChrisO 19:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC).
I have examined some of your comments on umpteen pages and I would say you were not neutral. It appears to me that there are umpteen, often cotnradictory, rules on Misplaced Pages which, at the end of the day, are used to suit almost any occasion. Reading them I would say that in real terms it is almost impossible to do anything right. Chelsea Tory 09:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC).
A further trawl just reinforced what I've said here. I wanted to make some article contributions and contribute to others but when hagiographers of Marxists and Communists (in Canada of all places!) have free reign, and call traditional Tories in Britain "Xenophobics", "race-baiters", and attack perfectly legitimate articles which they call "right-wing propaganda" (even when they are about people or groups wno are no longer active) I am dissuaded. I have even seen comments that several users use the same grammar or similar ISP numbers and so they must be the same person. Quite pathetic. Chelsea Tory 10:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Warning
Wholesale deletion is not the way to deal with one fact you dislike within a biography. And accusing everyone who disagrees with you of bias is known locally as MPOV, the polar opposite of the neutral point of view required by policy. Blanking articles is considered vandalism, and can get you blocked. Guy 21:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC).
How dare you threaten me. You are referring, of course, to the GLF article which I merely reverted to the previous position because of the directions of the Misplaced Pages Legal Team. I have been unable to find where that team have given the go-ahead for restoration of the illegal materials within it and so I correctly reverted the article. No "vandalism" was involved and you are out of order. Chelsea Tory 06:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Information about Misplaced Pages's rules is not a threat; it is helpful information. Futher, "How dare you" is a contentious and hostile approach to discussion, which is unlikely to yield any results which are beneficial to you or to the project. Finally, you are WP:Wikilawyering, which is almost certain to get you nowhere except possibly blocked as a disruptive element. I strongly adivse you to learn to discuss things civilly. KillerChihuahua 10:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Brad really needs to get more involved in this issue--Edchilvers 17:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- He already is. SV and I have communicated with Brad and Jimbo respectively, I think we are clear on the foundation's position here. I am not aware that Chelsea Tory has communicated directly with the foundation. Guy 08:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Take a deep breath...
I am clearing the Talk page of Gregory Lauder-Frost. You are welcome to help to improve the article, but please read my message on the talk page before wading in. Guy 19:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC).
One would hope that the archives would continue to be available. Chelsea Tory 14:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC).
I have been on the continent so unable to visit Misplaced Pages. Back today. Chelsea Tory 07:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Monday Club
Reading the above, I can see you've run into trouble before on Wikpedia for POV pushing. Your reversion on the Monday Club article was unjustified. You can't revert properly sourced material just because you don't personally agree with it. And putting right wing in speech marks was frankly silly. --SandyDancer 19:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)