Misplaced Pages

Talk:MTS Oceanos: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:08, 25 July 2017 editLucas (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,250 edits Yiannis Avranas merger← Previous edit Revision as of 16:22, 26 July 2017 edit undoFrankie1969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,953 edits Yiannis Avranas mergerNext edit →
Line 55: Line 55:
::::I absolutely disagree. If you're concerned about Francesco, I'll work on merging him next. - ] (]) 12:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC) ::::I absolutely disagree. If you're concerned about Francesco, I'll work on merging him next. - ] (]) 12:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
:::::] I absolutely disagreed with your merging: you deleted information, you didn't notify this action to anyone, and merged the pages based on "silent consent", which is - according to the guidelines - "]". Considering that your action is now disputed, according to the guidelines, the page should be reverted and a proactive discussion should be started. We all will listen to your opinion with no biases, but please follow what ] and ] says, without imposing your point of view. Thanks. --] (]) 22:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC) :::::] I absolutely disagreed with your merging: you deleted information, you didn't notify this action to anyone, and merged the pages based on "silent consent", which is - according to the guidelines - "]". Considering that your action is now disputed, according to the guidelines, the page should be reverted and a proactive discussion should be started. We all will listen to your opinion with no biases, but please follow what ] and ] says, without imposing your point of view. Thanks. --] (]) 22:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
::::::Ugh, I know, I know, WP would rather err on the side of too many articles than too few. I still say it's telling that not a single editor cared enough about this guy to get involved for nearly 3 months (from when I set the merger tag to when I did the merge). IMO, 99% of one-eventers should be merged into the parent event. - ] (]) 16:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:22, 26 July 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MTS Oceanos article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconShipwrecks Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

  • Lady Elizabeth (1879)
    • Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
    • Improve grammar
    • Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
    • Discuss desired additions -None
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSouth Africa Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconShips
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShipsWikiProject icon
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconGreece Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on August 4, 2012.

Hmm: the contents of this article bear an uncanny resemblance to . Does this need to be fixed? Senderspace 22:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

While researching the reason for the leak in the sea chest I noticed similar wording on a number of sites. It's hard to know who the origiginal author is. --AussieLegend 03:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

This article is not very informative, it lacks many important details. For example the 'Aftermath' is pointless, it is devoid of any useful information such as the actual fate of the captian.24.201.140.3 00:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


@AussieLegend,I looked at an online simulation on Youtube according to it a corner of the Sea Chest was rusted.

Removed Text

I have noticed this page has been vandalized and I have removed the sentence "Cowardly captain James Mayne fled, leaving women, children, and his own pet rats for dead." from the opening paragraph of this article.Tundrawinds 16:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

According to Time, he left his pet dog and canary aboard to be rescued by one of the entertainers who was left to command the rescue effort. That article, however, states that our illustrious Capt. Avranas departed by helicopter whereas all other sources mention he left by lifeboat (one source even mentions that the Avranas & Crew wasted a second lifeboat to haul luggage). El_C 21:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Jonah

MOSS HILL was also on the MS Achille Lauro when it collided and suffered a huge fire. See CH4 documentary "Why ships sink" 01/04/2012 21:00 82.21.204.60 (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Misquote

The Captain actually said "If some people like to stay, they can stay.", vs. the quoted "If some people want to stay, they can stay." ('like' vs 'want') The reference contains this misquote, which is why I didn't edit the change in the article text. I have just listened to the quote twice on TV, and clearly heard the word 'like' and not 'want'. The quote was also translated onscreen as 'like', so there's no doubt about it. As I said, the reference is wrong, and who knows, maybe their source was wrong also. 99.92.102.115 (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Slow-motion edit-warring

Resolved

Brimspark is edit-warring in slow motion (1, 2) adding material from an unreliable source which is a personal website by one of the survivors of the sinking titled "Tracy Hills: My story of the sinking". Example:

Moss and Tracy Hills and four others were recognized for their bravery and valour.[http://www.oceanossinking.com/index.php?page_id=16

Let's get this straight: The website belongs to Tracy Hills and the edit says that Moss and Tracy Hills and four others were recognized for their bravery and valour.. In other words Brimspark's edit uses Tracy Hill's personal website to add praise for Tracy Hill. In addition, other material Brimspark is introducing is unsourced. Let's get serious. I will take this to WP:ANI if this editing behaviour continues. Δρ.Κ.  17:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for finally letting me know what was wrong with the article, you could have just removed that sentence in question and left the rest of my edits intact. For instance I went to the New York Times for the captain's story and you just wholesale reverted that too. I still think it was an extremely brave thing that the Hills did to save the passengers after the cowardly crew fled. Brimspark (talk) 03:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
@Brimspark: Please leave the sarcastic remarks. I told you in my edit summary ""My story of the sinking"? No thanks" meaning that Tracy Hills' "My story of the sinking" was not acceptable. Sorry that you didn't get the idea that you cannot use Tracy Hills' website to praise Tracy Hills' actions, let alone my 3RR message on your talk advising you to stop the edit-warring and discuss on talk. The other substantial edit you made was adding He justified his actions saying that the "ship was in darkness and the batteries on the crew's walkie-talkies had died, meaning that he had no communications with his crew or with other rescue craft" which is unsourced. The existing New York Times reference mentions nothing about your edit. You did not add any other reference to the NYT. What NYT are you talking about when you say For instance I went to the New York Times for the captain's story...? I also see that you restored the unsourced edit. This is continuing the edit-war. I will remove it if you do not provide a source for He justified his actions saying that the "ship was in darkness and the batteries on the crew's walkie-talkies had died, meaning that he had no communications with his crew or with other rescue craft", which is not in the existing NYT reference. Δρ.Κ.  03:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, here is the NYT source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brimspark (talkcontribs) 04:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. It is resolved then. Best regards. Δρ.Κ.  04:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Admittedly I remembered doing the edit in haste, and forgot to add the second NYT source to the existing NYT reference. Glad we cleared up this misunderstanding. Brimspark (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
So am I. Thank you again. Δρ.Κ.  17:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Official Reports?

Has anyone been able to locate South African/Greek Maritime safety reports on this incident, they should be reliable sources. 58.7.96.218 (talk) 01:20, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Yiannis Avranas merger

MERGE - Avranas is a one-eventer. He has no relevance to the world beyond his role in this incident. - Frankie1969 (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello Frankie1969, sorry for writing a bit late but I don't check this article so often. I don't agree witht the merge. As with Francesco Schettino, the article about Yiannis Avranas has a separate relevance, as proven by many cited relevant and international sources. --Lucas (talk) 04:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
I will restore this main article in the next weeks if no one disagree but leaving the good paragraph in the Oceanos' article, which is still interesting and appropriate. :) --Lucas (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
I absolutely disagree. If you're concerned about Francesco, I'll work on merging him next. - Frankie1969 (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Frankie1969 I absolutely disagreed with your merging: you deleted information, you didn't notify this action to anyone, and merged the pages based on "silent consent", which is - according to the guidelines - "the weakest form of consensus". Considering that your action is now disputed, according to the guidelines, the page should be reverted and a proactive discussion should be started. We all will listen to your opinion with no biases, but please follow what WP:CONS and WP:MERGE says, without imposing your point of view. Thanks. --Lucas (talk) 22:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Ugh, I know, I know, WP would rather err on the side of too many articles than too few. I still say it's telling that not a single editor cared enough about this guy to get involved for nearly 3 months (from when I set the merger tag to when I did the merge). IMO, 99% of one-eventers should be merged into the parent event. - Frankie1969 (talk) 16:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories: