Misplaced Pages

User talk:Brya: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:24, 3 October 2006 editBrya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,919 edits →ICBN Glossary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:33, 3 October 2006 edit undoKP Botany (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,588 edits →ICBN GlossaryNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


:::::Yes it is out. It is called the ''Vienna Code''. And I have never found a site that was anywhere near reliable on the matter of botanical nomenclature. Best, ] 20:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC) :::::Yes it is out. It is called the ''Vienna Code''. And I have never found a site that was anywhere near reliable on the matter of botanical nomenclature. Best, ] 20:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

::::::Oh, I've still been using the St. Louis Code. Thanks. Although I don't doubt you have personally never found a reliable site on botanical nomenclature I do doubt that you've seen them all. I've found quite a bit of useful and accurate and fun information on the web about botanical nomenclature. ] 20:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:33, 3 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Brya, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  24 September 2005

Restarting

Archived Brya 08:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Lebedev

I was looking through the Mikhail Lebedev page and it seems to be vanity and non-notable to me. First of all, there is hardly any information about him on Google. Then, none of the publications seem to be news-worthy and notable. Finally, the scientist does not have many 1st author publications and seems to be non-important in his field. If you agree with me, can you please help me nominate Mikhail Lebedev for deletion? --GoOdCoNtEnT 08:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Contact

Brya,

you write As I have been de facto blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Please contact me by email so I can help you work it out. I feel that as far as contents of the artcile go, you have at least one point, but it is hard for me to help you here. My english alas is insufficient to "hit the right tone".

TeunSpaans 04:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

ICBN Glossary

Where is the Glossary in the ICBN? I only have access to the on-line version, and I can't seem to find the glossary. Thanks, KP Botany 17:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

It is on page 484-491. I have no idea when it will be online. I expect they want to sell a reasonable amount of books before they do so. Best, Brya 17:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Ah, so it's not in the on-line one. Well, there are good sites with the defintions. Still, it would be easier to use on-line with a glossary. Thanks, KP Botany 18:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
No, it is in the new one. Actually, I don't know of any good sites with definitions on botanical nomenclature. Best, Brya 20:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, the one newer than the St. Louis Code is out? It's not on the IAPT site links, yet. What is it called? There are actually a number of sites that include glossaries of all the various types and other bits of information for using botanical nomenclature. KP Botany 20:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes it is out. It is called the Vienna Code. And I have never found a site that was anywhere near reliable on the matter of botanical nomenclature. Best, Brya 20:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I've still been using the St. Louis Code. Thanks. Although I don't doubt you have personally never found a reliable site on botanical nomenclature I do doubt that you've seen them all. I've found quite a bit of useful and accurate and fun information on the web about botanical nomenclature. KP Botany 20:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)