| Revision as of 03:00, 1 August 2017 editEmmy Expert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,500 edits okay← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:31, 1 August 2017 edit undoRibbet32 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,818 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Switching pictures == | |||
| I've noticed you've been quite busy changing photos on film articles lately to the most recent profile photo. I was wondering if you have any reason at all for doing this other than ]? Some of the articles you've edited are for films 10- or 20-years-old or older, and you're replacing photos of actors and actresses as they looked then with what they look like as very elderly men and women. And showing readers the same photos they've already seen. ] (]) 04:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :I've also talked to you about this. I appreciate your edit summary response to ] ({{tq|I apologize, it’s just that I’m obsessed and dedicated to replace these images with one(s) of more currency of the person; that’s my reason. accept?}}), however it is very disruptive to update images for no reason except to make them more "current". At the very least, you should explain your intent in your edit summary, but you should expect pushback and reversions. Obsession or not, I really wish you would stop doing this en masse, and only update articles you feel are truly improved by a different image.— ]<sup>]</sup> 17:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um, I don't think you've got the message, as you're still switching images just for the sake of it. I really think it's time you move on to other things. This isn't constructive, it's kind of the opposite. ] (]) 16:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 1 August 2017
Switching pictures
I've noticed you've been quite busy changing photos on film articles lately to the most recent profile photo. I was wondering if you have any reason at all for doing this other than increasing your edit count? Some of the articles you've edited are for films 10- or 20-years-old or older, and you're replacing photos of actors and actresses as they looked then with what they look like as very elderly men and women. And showing readers the same photos they've already seen. Ribbet32 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- I've also talked to you about this. I appreciate your edit summary response to Ribbet32 (
I apologize, it’s just that I’m obsessed and dedicated to replace these images with one(s) of more currency of the person; that’s my reason. accept?
), however it is very disruptive to update images for no reason except to make them more "current". At the very least, you should explain your intent in your edit summary, but you should expect pushback and reversions. Obsession or not, I really wish you would stop doing this en masse, and only update articles you feel are truly improved by a different image.— TAnthony 17:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)- Um, I don't think you've got the message, as you're still switching images just for the sake of it. I really think it's time you move on to other things. This isn't constructive, it's kind of the opposite. Ribbet32 (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)