| Revision as of 15:08, 11 August 2017 editEEng (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors97,795 edits →Your false claim of vandalism on 29 July: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:00, 13 August 2017 edit undoRitchie333 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators125,300 edits →Your false claim of vandalism on 29 July: action requiredNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| ::Thanks replied on the thread. -] <sup>(])</sup> 05:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC) | ::Thanks replied on the thread. -] <sup>(])</sup> 05:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *Not adequately. In fact, you've made things worse for yourself. ''']]''' 15:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC) | *Not adequately. In fact, you've made things worse for yourself. ''']]''' 15:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| You need to justify your blocks properly, or go to ] and resign. Otherwise it looks like the community will have to create an Arbcom case to take them away from you. ] ] ] 15:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:00, 13 August 2017
Deletion of Aberdeen Pride
In 2006, you deleted Pride in Aberdeen after a deletion discussion that was not entirely unanimous. Some editors considered it non-notable, others thought it was notable. Today, at least fifteen UK cities have articles on their pride parades. For the Aberdeen article, six people motivated their reasons to delete; five motivated a keep, two deletions were unmotivated or invalid. Although somewhat more people preferred deletion than keeping the article, I personally would not call it a consensus. Do you think it would be reasonable to allow the community to reassess the deletion? --Gerrit 17:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Gerrit - given the no. of years that was passed between the deletion I would suggest you start a new article and see where that ends up (instead of reverting the deletion), as a lot of information back in the 2006 version would have been out of date. -WinHunter 07:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.
Technical news
- Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding
?fuzzy=1to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term. - A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.
- Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding
Miscellaneous
- A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
- A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Misplaced Pages, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
- Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Misplaced Pages – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Misplaced Pages has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Catalogue of One Thousand Named Galaxies
Hi, discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Astronomy#CMG - "Catalogue of One Thousand Named Galaxies" decided not to include Catalogue of One Thousand Named Galaxies. So we have been removing these entries. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- That being so, would you consider reverting your recent edits and reviewing the block you placed on an IP who removed multiple mentions of it?--Anthony Bradbury 17:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
Administrator changes
Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 
Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem
Guideline and policy news
- Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
- A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
- An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.
Technical news
- LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Misplaced Pages. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
- The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Your false claim of vandalism on 29 July
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.45.251 (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, you need to address that ANI discussion pretty quickly before people contemplate trying to remove your administrator rights. Please do it ASAP. Ritchie333 10:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks replied on the thread. -WinHunter 05:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Not adequately. In fact, you've made things worse for yourself. EEng 15:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
You need to justify your blocks properly, or go to WP:BN and resign. Otherwise it looks like the community will have to create an Arbcom case to take them away from you. Ritchie333 15:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)