| Revision as of 01:29, 5 October 2006 editRHaworth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,796 edits vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:02, 5 October 2006 edit undoSudharsansn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,134 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| However bad you may think the ] article is, sticking a speedy delete tag on it is not the right approach. It makes you the vandal and is liable to get you blocked. -- ] 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | However bad you may think the ] article is, sticking a speedy delete tag on it is not the right approach. It makes you the vandal and is liable to get you blocked. -- ] 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : | |||
| Dear Roger, you might want to go through the history of that page to understand what I literally mean, when I say 'vandalism'. Pls refer to ], the talk page and the article history and also the points being made there. | |||
| While every effort is being made to ensure that the other version stays as it is, why is effort to balance this article, inspite of several edits being negated due to mass reverts? That's my whole point!! Why is a pro-Sinhala mafia thwarting every attempt to balance this article, inspite of several cited reasons behind Alred Durairaj, Child killer mentions, it always reverts back to the original Anti-Tamil, Pro-Sinhala version. I put up the vandalized tag to clearly suggest that every effort made to ensure NPOV is being negated. Any suggestions?? | |||
| What do you think should be done about that article. Thanks for your mention ] 02:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:02, 5 October 2006
VP Page
Hi Sudharsansn, Let me know whats your plan of action. I guess there is a lot to be done. It would certainly be a good idea to protect the page, but that would also prevent anyone from editing except through the admins. Elalan 02:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
vandalism
However bad you may think the Velupillai Prabhakaran article is, sticking a speedy delete tag on it is not the right approach. It makes you the vandal and is liable to get you blocked. -- RHaworth 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Dear Roger, you might want to go through the history of that page to understand what I literally mean, when I say 'vandalism'. Pls refer to Velupillai Prabhakaran, the talk page and the article history and also the points being made there.
While every effort is being made to ensure that the other version stays as it is, why is effort to balance this article, inspite of several edits being negated due to mass reverts? That's my whole point!! Why is a pro-Sinhala mafia thwarting every attempt to balance this article, inspite of several cited reasons behind Alred Durairaj, Child killer mentions, it always reverts back to the original Anti-Tamil, Pro-Sinhala version. I put up the vandalized tag to clearly suggest that every effort made to ensure NPOV is being negated. Any suggestions??
What do you think should be done about that article. Thanks for your mention Sudharsansn 02:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)