| Revision as of 17:58, 21 August 2017 editDanielRigal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users48,054 edits Caution: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on User talk:DanielRigal. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:08, 21 August 2017 edit undoQubixQdotta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users920 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 17:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC) | ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 17:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ===ARCHIVE of deleted content by DanielRigel=== | |||
| ==Nazism "incorrect information"?== | |||
| Explain how Nazism is a "far-right" ideology when its literally called National Socialism? How is a socialist ideology considered far-right? Do you really believe these sources you have in this article are being honest? <span style='color:white;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.9em 0.1em green'></span> ]] 23:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :So, if the Nazis say something we take it at face value now do we? How stupid would we have to be to do that? The Nazis lied pretty much all the time and giving things misleading names was a favourite tactic of theirs. Remember that they called invading other people's countries "living room" and murder squads "special groups"? All lies. "National Socialism" aka Nazism (which pretty much all historians agree is far-right) was never a type of Socialism. It was a type of Fascism (which pretty much all historians agree is far-right) with a few mixed elements of other things thrown in and the nasty turned all he way up to 11. I'm sorry. I but don't have time to waste on going deeper into this when it has been done hundreds of times before. Read the history books that are used to reference the statement that the Nazis were far right. Read the Talk pages, and the archives of the Talk pages, to see how this BS has been suggested and rejected over and over again for many years, often with better and more detailed explanations than I am giving here. In summary, This is going nowhere. You can ask about on the article Talk page if you like but you can expect to be rebuffed. Attacking the article again will just get you warnings for vandalism. This revisionism has to stop now. It wasn't funny before before people started getting killed again and it is now even less funny than ever. I don't mind helping confused people to understand where they have been misled but it is time for zero tolerance of intentional propaganda and revisionism. If you really do believe that all the history books are wrong (and intentionally dishonest) then Misplaced Pages is probably not for you. In fact, that seems to be a view incompatible with any understanding of the real world at all. --] (]) 09:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::I would prefer if you didn't try to gaslight me when I'm trying to have a civil discussion with you. You are acting very hostile towards me and I do not appreciate it when I am trying to work with you constructively on an article. I think you should go read ] one more time. <span style='color:white;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.9em 0.1em green'></span> ]] 07:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:08, 21 August 2017
August 2017
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nazism. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:DanielRigal. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
ARCHIVE of deleted content by DanielRigel
Nazism "incorrect information"?
Explain how Nazism is a "far-right" ideology when its literally called National Socialism? How is a socialist ideology considered far-right? Do you really believe these sources you have in this article are being honest? ++ 23:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- So, if the Nazis say something we take it at face value now do we? How stupid would we have to be to do that? The Nazis lied pretty much all the time and giving things misleading names was a favourite tactic of theirs. Remember that they called invading other people's countries "living room" and murder squads "special groups"? All lies. "National Socialism" aka Nazism (which pretty much all historians agree is far-right) was never a type of Socialism. It was a type of Fascism (which pretty much all historians agree is far-right) with a few mixed elements of other things thrown in and the nasty turned all he way up to 11. I'm sorry. I but don't have time to waste on going deeper into this when it has been done hundreds of times before. Read the history books that are used to reference the statement that the Nazis were far right. Read the Talk pages, and the archives of the Talk pages, to see how this BS has been suggested and rejected over and over again for many years, often with better and more detailed explanations than I am giving here. In summary, This is going nowhere. You can ask about on the article Talk page if you like but you can expect to be rebuffed. Attacking the article again will just get you warnings for vandalism. This revisionism has to stop now. It wasn't funny before before people started getting killed again and it is now even less funny than ever. I don't mind helping confused people to understand where they have been misled but it is time for zero tolerance of intentional propaganda and revisionism. If you really do believe that all the history books are wrong (and intentionally dishonest) then Misplaced Pages is probably not for you. In fact, that seems to be a view incompatible with any understanding of the real world at all. --DanielRigal (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- I would prefer if you didn't try to gaslight me when I'm trying to have a civil discussion with you. You are acting very hostile towards me and I do not appreciate it when I am trying to work with you constructively on an article. I think you should go read WP:GOODFAITH one more time. ++ 07:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)