Revision as of 14:46, 30 August 2017 editGnome de plume (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,748 editsm Reverted edits by 86.163.56.146 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot III← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:45, 22 December 2017 edit undoBoomer Vial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,907 edits →A possibility of the return of Kim Cardassian: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<!-- MM Requested by User:80atUO via IRC --> | <!-- MM Requested by User:80atUO via IRC --> | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList&oldid=779781897 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList&oldid=779781897 --> | ||
== A possibility of the return of Kim Cardassian == | |||
Hey Tiptoety. I seen that you participated in the SPI investigation involving the above mentioned blocked editor. I know it was a long time ago, but I was curious as to your opinion to is a sock of Cardassian. I don't want to ping them into this converstation, as they have a tendency to exhibit battleground behavior when confronted. I notice that "~enwiki" was a reoccuring theme in the aformentioned SPI case, and since Power~enwiki came about, I've seen a large uptake in accounts with this phrase. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, and in advance for your response. ]<sup>] • ]</sup> 03:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:45, 22 December 2017
11:06 pm, 26 December 2024 (PDT) Tiptoety's userpage | talk | e-mail | contribs | subpages | edit count | awards | adoption program | ||||||||||
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, Merry Christmas!
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Tiptoety. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Police cadet for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Police cadet is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Police cadet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Meetup InvitationYou are invited to the upcoming Asian Pacific American Heritage month edit-athon. This will be held on the first floor of the Knight library at the University of Oregon. For more information please see: Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA, a Facebook event link is also available on the Meetup page.
Hope to see you there!
A possibility of the return of Kim CardassianHey Tiptoety. I seen that you participated in the SPI investigation involving the above mentioned blocked editor. I know it was a long time ago, but I was curious as to your opinion to Power~enwiki is a sock of Cardassian. I don't want to ping them into this converstation, as they have a tendency to exhibit battleground behavior when confronted. I notice that "~enwiki" was a reoccuring theme in the aformentioned SPI case, and since Power~enwiki came about, I've seen a large uptake in accounts with this phrase. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, and in advance for your response. Boomer Vial 03:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |