| Revision as of 00:08, 8 October 2006 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits →[]: wrong place← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:55, 17 October 2006 edit undoRuhrfisch (talk | contribs)Administrators52,118 edits →[]: semi automated peer reviewNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :From the instructions above, "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." ] 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | :From the instructions above, "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." ] 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Please see ] peer review suggestions ]. Thanks, ] 20:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:55, 17 October 2006
Uncaria tomentosa
I'm trying to follow proper protocols and procedure. I would like some additional outside input. I feel the edits were of good quality and well made, as well as factually and accurately stated. I eliminated information of no relevance "Iliana", and added content that speak to the encyclopedic nature of the plant as well as that of Misplaced Pages policy. I know a great deal abou tthis plant as I haev taken it for a long time and done a grate deal of reasearch on it and other simalar plants with healing powers.
Understand I'm still very new at this and have been in an edit war with this user. I wish to separate any conflict and improve my editing skills and knowledge. A user did weigh in with his thoughts, but as WLU seems to own each and every pages she edits it made no difference at all.
I seek input to the content to help me be a better editor.--Mystar 04:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
The Cat's Claw is classified as a liana, a woody vine. Mystar added plagiarised information which I removed and replaced with a more generalized geographic category, which I justified in the talk page. He does not seem to have done any research. He reverted edits in which I had added a scientific, peer-reviewed article, specifically a review article. WLU 13:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- From the instructions above, "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." Sandy 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 20:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)