| Revision as of 07:47, 27 September 2017 editMhhossein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,833 edits →September 2017: Is he here to...?← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:27, 27 September 2017 edit undoPsychonot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users642 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| == September 2017 == | |||
| ] Please stop ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. ''Cross-article disruption. -''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there, | |||
| {{ping|LouisAragon}} I don't have any content dispute with anyone. If you have any problem with any of my edit, revert them. I really don't care. I edit sometime just for timepass. I created some articles like ] and ]. Some editors wanted to delete them, I let them do it, but they were not deleted . I don't have any content dispute, or any dispute with anyone. Thanks and best regards,--] (]) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| === Template:Nuclear power in Iran === | |||
| I have reverted your edit to ] where you added Khamenei's name to the section 'Iranian nuclear negotiators'. Khamenei is not a 'nuclear negotiator' involved in negotiations, unless you can provide some ] stating such. ] (]) 19:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|DA1}} Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei issued a letter of guidelines to President Rouhani, on how to proceed with the deal. The new conditions set by him nullifed the original agreement I thought that makes him involved as a negotiator. | |||
| : That does not make him a negotiator, just as a lecture or command is not a debate. You need to be involved 'in' formal negotiations to be a nuclear negotiator, which he is not. ] (]) 02:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| == Stop removing sourced material == | == Stop removing sourced material == | ||
| Line 25: | Line 6: | ||
| Please stop from the articles. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC) | Please stop from the articles. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | :Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you shall be on ].--] (]) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == September 2017 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 21:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :His involvement now has a source. Next time don't waste people's time removing information which is known to be true because it has a lacking citation, find a better one.] (]) 21:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Psychonot, please don't remove reports by others from ]. If the report isn't valid it will be declined anyway. ] (]) 22:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::]: Among other warnings, he has already received mine for removing the well sourced materials. --] <sup>]</sup> 07:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 27 September 2017
Stop removing sourced material
Please stop removing sourced materials from the articles. --Mhhossein 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you shall be on Talk:Ali Khamenei.--Psychonot (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)