| Revision as of 19:36, 27 September 2017 editPsychonot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users642 edits →Stop removing sourced material← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:37, 27 September 2017 edit undoMhhossein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,833 edits →1RR violation: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :::I believe I already responded to this on --] (]) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | :::I believe I already responded to this on --] (]) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == 1RR violation == | |||
| As you know, ] is under ] and it says that "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours." In violation to this ruling, you (the original author) my reverts and might be blocked after being reported. However, I can understand that you could've missed this sanction being applied to the article. So, are you going to revert your self and remove the materials as I did and , or do you want me to report your violation so that admins address your case? I think, we can settle it down without making any reports. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:37, 27 September 2017
Stop removing sourced material
Please stop removing sourced materials from the articles. --Mhhossein 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you will be on Talk:Ali Khamenei.--Psychonot (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- You need to check the diff once again. You had removed "Gareth Porter argues that ..." which was "nicely" sourced. --Mhhossein 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- I believe I already responded to this on Talk:Ali_Khamenei#Porter.27s_opinion--Psychonot (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
1RR violation
As you know, the article is under WP:ARBPIA and it says that "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours." In violation to this ruling, you (the original author) reverted my reverts and might be blocked after being reported. However, I can understand that you could've missed this sanction being applied to the article. So, are you going to revert your self and remove the materials as I did here and here, or do you want me to report your violation so that admins address your case? I think, we can settle it down without making any reports. --Mhhossein 19:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)