| Revision as of 13:15, 4 October 2017 editGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:53, 4 October 2017 edit undoWorld's Lamest Critic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,233 edits →Olympia Nelson: A clear instance of ignoring any kind of critical thoughtNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Snow keep''' -- This nomination is a clear instance of what happens when we ignore the advice of ]. When half a dozen cabient ministers go on record about images of someone, and the press covers the controversy, in detail, then that individual measures up to the inclusion criteria of GNG. ] (]) 13:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC) | *'''Snow keep''' -- This nomination is a clear instance of what happens when we ignore the advice of ]. When half a dozen cabient ministers go on record about images of someone, and the press covers the controversy, in detail, then that individual measures up to the inclusion criteria of GNG. ] (]) 13:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::The controversy is in the appropriate article. ] (]) 14:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:53, 4 October 2017
Olympia Nelson
- Olympia Nelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography seems to exist only to draw attention to the subject having posed naked as a six year-old. Fails WP:GNG. The editor who created this article appears to have retired. Contested WP:PROD. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Snow keep -- This nomination is a clear instance of what happens when we ignore the advice of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. When half a dozen cabient ministers go on record about images of someone, and the press covers the controversy, in detail, then that individual measures up to the inclusion criteria of GNG. Geo Swan (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- The controversy is already covered in the appropriate article. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)