Revision as of 04:39, 15 November 2017 edit70.51.45.76 (talk) →Requested move 10 November 2017← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:57, 17 November 2017 edit undoAmakuru (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,064 edits add unsigned template and relistNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{requested move/dated|«VEON Armenia» CJSC}} | {{requested move/dated|«VEON Armenia» CJSC}} | ||
] → {{no redirect|«VEON Armenia» CJSC}} – the company to «VEON Armenia» CJSC in October 2017 ] (]) 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) | ] → {{no redirect|«VEON Armenia» CJSC}} – the company to «VEON Armenia» CJSC in October 2017 ] (]) 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) <small>--'''''Relisting.''''' — ] (]) 12:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Oppose''' per pretty much everything. This is not ], it violates ] by including extraneous typographic decoration, it's against ], ], ], and MOS:TM again in using ATTENTION CAPS on a name that is not an acronym, and is against MOS:TM yet again by unnecessarily including a corporation-type designation at the end. |
*'''Oppose''' per pretty much everything. This is not ], it violates ] by including extraneous typographic decoration, it's against ], ], ], and MOS:TM again in using ATTENTION CAPS on a name that is not an acronym, and is against MOS:TM yet again by unnecessarily including a corporation-type designation at the end. '''Support Alternative,''' for now: ]. And move ] to ] per MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, MOS:ACRO, and MOS:TM (and numerous precedents, most obviously ] versus "SONY"). Veon is not an acronym, the capitalization is just marketing stylization, and reliable sources do not consistently capitalize it . {{unsigned|SMcCandlish|18:57, 10 November 2017}} | ||
*'''Strong oppose''' ] using special characters for no reason. ] using special styling for bad reasons. -- ] (]) 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | *'''Strong oppose''' ] using special characters for no reason. ] using special styling for bad reasons. -- ] (]) 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:57, 17 November 2017
Armenia Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Requested move 10 November 2017
It has been proposed in this section that Telecom Armenia be renamed and moved to «VEON Armenia» CJSC. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Armenia Telephone Company → «VEON Armenia» CJSC – the company changed it's name to «VEON Armenia» CJSC in October 2017 Marinaddd (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per pretty much everything. This is not WP:RECOGNIZABLE, it violates MOS:TM by including extraneous typographic decoration, it's against MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, MOS:ACRO, and MOS:TM again in using ATTENTION CAPS on a name that is not an acronym, and is against MOS:TM yet again by unnecessarily including a corporation-type designation at the end. Support Alternative, for now: Veon Armenia. And move VEON to Veon (company) per MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, MOS:ACRO, and MOS:TM (and numerous precedents, most obviously Sony versus "SONY"). Veon is not an acronym, the capitalization is just marketing stylization, and reliable sources do not consistently capitalize it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by SMcCandlish (talk • contribs) 18:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose WP:AT using special characters for no reason. WP:TM using special styling for bad reasons. -- 70.51.45.76 (talk) 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)