| Revision as of 18:37, 2 December 2004 editCberlet (talk | contribs)11,487 edits Please try to be fair and balanced | Revision as of 15:15, 6 December 2004 edit undoCberlet (talk | contribs)11,487 edits Added NPOV noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Chip Berlet - Political Research Associates | Chip Berlet - Political Research Associates | ||
| == Added NPOV note == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I am inviting a discussion of how to make this page balanced, while cutting the material that is not accurate. There are only a tiny handful of people who are critics of PRA. I am calling for a discussion about how to present this criticism fairly. | |||
| This page is now unbalanced in favor of PRA. Let the critics add material so that it does not contain false claims, and does not exceed 50% of the page. | |||
| --] 15:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:15, 6 December 2004
Hi,
Supporters of Lyndon LaRouche and other critics of Political Research Associates tend to post material here that is not merely critical but full of false or very outdated information. Please try to keep a balance of positive and negative out of fairness. Try to actually fact check criticisms before posting them.
Chip Berlet - Political Research Associates
Added NPOV note
Hi,
I am inviting a discussion of how to make this page balanced, while cutting the material that is not accurate. There are only a tiny handful of people who are critics of PRA. I am calling for a discussion about how to present this criticism fairly.
This page is now unbalanced in favor of PRA. Let the critics add material so that it does not contain false claims, and does not exceed 50% of the page. --Cberlet 15:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)