| Revision as of 07:06, 17 October 2006 editGleng (talk | contribs)2,419 edits →What is V RS?← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:50, 17 October 2006 edit undoIamthebob (talk | contribs)198 edits →What is V RS?Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| I was referring to WP: V and WP: RS - sources that are a) verifiable and b) reliable] 07:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | I was referring to WP: V and WP: RS - sources that are a) verifiable and b) reliable] 07:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Ah, thanks a lot! ] 21:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 17 October 2006
I have left WP. Leave comments here if you wish, but they may not be read.
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 11:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Your third link in the section on "Dishonesty" on the evidence page (currently link #206) appears to have a problem. Guettarda 17:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
What is V RS?
In here you have used the term V RS many times, I was wondering what it meant? Thanks. iamthebob 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I was referring to WP: V and WP: RS - sources that are a) verifiable and b) reliableGleng 07:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks a lot! iamthebob 21:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)