| Revision as of 14:20, 17 October 2006 editM.K (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers13,165 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:41, 18 October 2006 edit undoGugutis (talk | contribs)109 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| <references/> | <references/> | ||
| *Ye. Thanks for advice. However, the only matter in this respect is our's common sense. ] 08:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:41, 18 October 2006
All my edits are based on the latest archeological, craniological, ethnographical, genetic, linquistic, etc. data and, of course, on interpretations of both the mentioned data and written historical sources by Lithuanian, Russian, Latvian and Polish researchers. Gugutis 11:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is not a reason to eliminate wikification. Please consult WP:MOS. --Ghirla 15:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For my proposition that western galindians settled farther west than any other ..., take a look at the various historical and archeological maps. Gugutis 14:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I still see that you did not understand the main issue – cite you sources, for example: Galindians should be de divided into two groups – Western and eastern and similar . References are very useful for other contributors.
Next, nobody is writing here different languages names in the division leads. M.K. 14:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- ^ Write here your academic sources which implies such division
- Ye. Thanks for advice. However, the only matter in this respect is our's common sense. Gugutis 08:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)