Revision as of 18:54, 6 February 2018 editJc3s5h (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,862 edits Discuss recent edit | Revision as of 01:43, 7 February 2018 edit undoJc3s5h (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,862 edits →Your edit to Transistor-transistor logic: add edit warning noticeNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The preceding edits changed "TTL inputs are the emitters of a ]" to "TTL inputs are the emitters of a ]". The sentence is describing the internal structure of the circuit, so it does not make sense to refer to the entire circuit at the end of the sentence. Also, before the change, the wikilink was to a different article, which is a sensible and normal thing to do. After the change the link attmpts to refer to the same article that the link occurs in, which is incorrect. ] (]) 18:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC) | The preceding edits changed "TTL inputs are the emitters of a ]" to "TTL inputs are the emitters of a ]". The sentence is describing the internal structure of the circuit, so it does not make sense to refer to the entire circuit at the end of the sentence. Also, before the change, the wikilink was to a different article, which is a sensible and normal thing to do. After the change the link attmpts to refer to the same article that the link occurs in, which is incorrect. ] (]) 18:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 01:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:43, 7 February 2018
Your edit to Transistor-transistor logic
Edits shortly preceding your edit to Transistor–transistor logic were wrong on two counts. Since you edited incorrect information, I have reverted your edit as well.
The preceding edits changed "TTL inputs are the emitters of a multiple-emitter transistor" to "TTL inputs are the emitters of a Transistor-Transistor logic". The sentence is describing the internal structure of the circuit, so it does not make sense to refer to the entire circuit at the end of the sentence. Also, before the change, the wikilink was to a different article, which is a sensible and normal thing to do. After the change the link attmpts to refer to the same article that the link occurs in, which is incorrect. Jc3s5h (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Transistor-transistor logic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jc3s5h (talk) 01:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)