Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sławomir Borewicz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:26, 20 October 2006 editIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 edits Bennie and Lennie← Previous edit Revision as of 12:53, 20 October 2006 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,696 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


:I think it's an articulate case in point of the recent wave of ] that has unfortunately come to haunt Polish, Ruthenian and Litvin topics in general, raising awareness of this pending problem. ] 23:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC) :I think it's an articulate case in point of the recent wave of ] that has unfortunately come to haunt Polish, Ruthenian and Litvin topics in general, raising awareness of this pending problem. ] 23:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
::While the problem undeniably exists, this was not a constructive way of dealing with it.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 12:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


==Bennie and Lennie== ==Bennie and Lennie==

Revision as of 12:53, 20 October 2006

Making jokes in mainspace

Errr, I don't get something: why is it not at Sławomir Borewicz?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Just give him one more barnstar straight away for yet another trol... great Wiki contribution, as you always do. We need more edits like this. These edits make Wiki a great place to be Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 06:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid that the article's title is a WP:POINT and it should be renamed. Unless I totally misunderstood this of course. --Lysy 08:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I didn't want to prove any point, I simply lost my temper and got carried away. Actually I thought people might actually like the idea. After all the -icz suffix is commonly associated with the GDL, so the personality might actually be Lithuanian, we don't know that. //Halibutt 09:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Everyone gets carried away in a while. I'm afraid that after you cool down, you'll realise that probably not everyone would share the sense of humour. I'm sure I don't need to advise what you should best do now. --Lysy 10:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I would do the move myself, but I'm not sure if our fellow editors would not consider it an example of my alleged anti-Lithuanianess. Is it ok for me to move the article to the Polish title? Feel free to revert my move if you do think so. //Halibutt 11:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it's an articulate case in point of the recent wave of Lithuanization that has unfortunately come to haunt Polish, Ruthenian and Litvin topics in general, raising awareness of this pending problem. Truthseeker 85.5 23:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
While the problem undeniably exists, this was not a constructive way of dealing with it.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  12:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Bennie and Lennie

I found this so hilarious that I was about to create in my userspace under the name user:Irpen/Lyolik i Bolik and new page that I envisioned like this:


Lyolik i Bolik or Lyolik and Bolik (Template:Lang-ru), (Template:Lang-pl) also known as Bennie and Lennie where...


I was about to save this article in my userspace (not in main, of course) as a joke and invite you all for a good laugh when I saw this :( as I was googling for links. Too bad this article was moved. It should have remained under the original name as a monument to WP:Point just like a redirect List of Polish Martyrdom sites still has an original masterpiece in its history. --Irpen 07:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)