Misplaced Pages

User talk:AWeidman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:14, 20 October 2006 editNwwaew (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,602 edits Mediation Case← Previous edit Revision as of 02:53, 24 October 2006 edit undoShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits suspected sock-puppettry, deepest and sincere apologies if I'm wrongNext edit →
Line 51: Line 51:
==Mediation over ]== ==Mediation over ]==
You have been listed as an involved party in ], and I have accepted the case at ]. If you can please take a look at the case and let us hear your side, I would appreciate it. Thanks! ](]) 13:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC) You have been listed as an involved party in ], and I have accepted the case at ]. If you can please take a look at the case and let us hear your side, I would appreciate it. Thanks! ](]) 13:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

==] case==
{| align="left"
|| ]
|}
You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] 02:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:53, 24 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, AWeidman, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 18:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy

Your article Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Misplaced Pages Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 13:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


Mediation @ the John Bowlby article

Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed here. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, Brisvegas 07:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

AMA request

I read your request for advocacy, and I'd be happy to give you a hand. If you'll give me your permission, I'll have a word with Jean Mercer on your behalf. --David.Mestel 08:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

See my response on my talk page. It would be helpful if you would let me know how you would like our communication to take place. --David.Mestel 06:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Psychology Wiki

Hi Dr. Art! This is Jaywin from The Psychology Wiki. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at the Psychology Wiki. If you'd like, check out our mission statement. If this project looks interesting to you, feel free to set up a user page. We'd certainly appreciate any contributions that you would be willing to make. Have a good one! EPM 02:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not show bad faith

When you moved the RfPP section back up, you removed my comment attached to your request that I be blocked. I have difficulty assuming that it was an inadvertent act. Please make sure that you do not blank or remove comments left by other users, as such actions are neither permitted on Misplaced Pages nor conducive to good faith discussion. FCYTravis 19:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

There was a lot to copy and it was a mistake. As an administrator, I'd assume you'd take the Misplaced Pages "Assume Good Faith" posture even more to heart and try to set an example. Dr. Becker-Weidman 20:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
You've requested that I be blocked for the grand crime of disagreeing with you on an article. I suggest that such inflammatory comments from you make it impossible for me to assume good faith is present in any of your actions. FCYTravis 22:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You are the only one who started and continued the "edit war." You have not acted in a manner consistent with your status as an administrator. You have side-stepped and refuse to participate in mediation; you engage in refusal to assume good faith, and you have misused your administrative rights. Dr. Becker-Weidman 23:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Attachment Therapy.
For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 12:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC).

Userbox

I noticed you had the same userbox as me. User:Kaiwen1/Vote to prohibit anonymous edits :) The Filmaker 14:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Mediation over Advocates for Children in Therapy

You have been listed as an involved party in Advocates for Children in Therapy, and I have accepted the case at Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-07 Advocates for Children in Therapy. If you can please take a look at the case and let us hear your side, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/AWeidman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. shotwell 02:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)