| Revision as of 23:20, 26 March 2018 editNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits →Your warning: fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:15, 27 March 2018 edit undoThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,837 edits →Your warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Please stop adding posts like these: , Seriously. Don't ask for closes, don't opine on what is needed for closes, just stop acting like a clerk. Participate in discussions but not in meta-discussions if that's clearer to follow. --] <sup>]</sup> 23:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | Please stop adding posts like these: , Seriously. Don't ask for closes, don't opine on what is needed for closes, just stop acting like a clerk. Participate in discussions but not in meta-discussions if that's clearer to follow. --] <sup>]</sup> 23:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :{{Reply to|NeilN}} - Sorry, but at the risk on incurring further wrath, and perhaps even some kind administrative action, I'm going to request that you clarify these comments. Diff #1; I wasn't aware that adding to a close request was not allowed. I also don't see how it's opinionated in any way that could potentially sway the outcome of a close. I kept it neutrally worded, requesting both considered attention and expedition. Diff #2 is just a question (is it even the right diff?). "Stop acting like a clerk", "Don't participate in meta-discussions", "Don't ask for closes" (am I now banned from ANRFC?), and this section header; "Your warning", are you referring to the recent AE warning? Or this post? I don't understand the basis for these comments, nor the apparent emotion behind them. Seriously. So if you clarify this a little, it would be appreciated. Thank you - <span style="text-shadow:#E05FFF 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">'']''</span> 00:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:15, 27 March 2018
|
message regarding an article, please post it there, not here. (and don't forget to {{ping}}) Thank you -  Wolf |
 |
| - all comments will be archived immediately after viewing - |
Your warning
Please stop adding posts like these: , Seriously. Don't ask for closes, don't opine on what is needed for closes, just stop acting like a clerk. Participate in discussions but not in meta-discussions if that's clearer to follow. --NeilN 23:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- @NeilN: - Sorry, but at the risk on incurring further wrath, and perhaps even some kind administrative action, I'm going to request that you clarify these comments. Diff #1; I wasn't aware that adding to a close request was not allowed. I also don't see how it's opinionated in any way that could potentially sway the outcome of a close. I kept it neutrally worded, requesting both considered attention and expedition. Diff #2 is just a question (is it even the right diff?). "Stop acting like a clerk", "Don't participate in meta-discussions", "Don't ask for closes" (am I now banned from ANRFC?), and this section header; "Your warning", are you referring to the recent AE warning? Or this post? I don't understand the basis for these comments, nor the apparent emotion behind them. Seriously. So if you clarify this a little, it would be appreciated. Thank you - WOLFchild 00:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)