Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:19, 24 April 2018

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Film: Core / American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is on the project's core list. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Animation: American / Films High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Frank Welker as Sharptooth

He wasn't credited in the credits, and I can find no proof that he voiced Sharptooth. Are there any sources saying he did? 50.132.2.24 (talk) 08:45, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Everywhere you look on the web, you'll find that he was voiced by Frank Welker. Probably used stock sounds though, and that's why they didn't credit him. Hypnobrai (talk) 02:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Those sites you say actually copied info from IMDB and that's not even considered a reliable source either. Even though IMDB has removed that info, the other sites have yet to to do the same thing. We should not rely on rumors and lies. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

And why do you think so? Hypnobrai (talk) 03:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

A better question would be "Where else do they get their info from?" and the only simple answer is IMDB and as I said before, it’s not a reliable source and never will. Even if Frank was in the film, the filmmakers would’ve said so, but they didn’t. So that’s why we should only rely on actual end credits and/or actual reliable source that doesn’t have information copied from IMDB and stop adding Frank to the list and I’m not gonna keep on saying this many times. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

A List of the Dinosaurs Used in the Film

Well I mean yeah the Tyrannosaurus could of died when it fell of the cliff but that would of made a pretty short movie now wouldn't of it? No, but seriously great article but there is somethings you "could," do. First of all maybe beside each dinosaurs name you could put the type of Dinosaur and a link to that Dinosaurs article page. That would be really helpful. Also for the Dinosaur inaccuracie thing I'm pretty sure there are a lot more inaccuracies than that. Maybe you could research it a little more and see what they are. After all it doesn't make sense to just put down the inaccuracies for the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Just a few suggestions. -James Pandora Adams — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.126.18.254 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

VHS uncut release?

"though the original version is still on early VHS copies of the film." ("Editing" paragraph) Could someone please get a verification or proof that there is the original version on early VHS copies of this film? I have researched this issue and have found many different views on this. For now, I think it would be best to put a verification tag beside that sentence in the paragraph to minimize potentially false information. 142.68.213.102 (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

 Removed - If you think it's potentially false, it better be removed. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This is false. If you're still around and its still there, it can be removed. People have tested this (and even the pre-release Mcdonalds VHS) and came up with nothing. Hypnobrai (talk) 02:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Editing

This article claims that scenes of Littlefoot's mother being attacked are unedited in early VHS releases, but it isn't cited and I can't find anything elsewhere to prove it. Additionally, my family owns the first VHS release of the movie after it aired in theaters, and the attack scene is still portrayed only in shadow. I wasn't born when this movie was in theaters so I don't know about that, but is there any real proof? It seems like this is just a rumor that was dispelled long ago… 71.166.34.105 (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

This is false. If you're still around and its still there, it can be removed. People have tested this (and even the pre-release Mcdonalds VHS) and came up with nothing. Hypnobrai (talk) 02:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Apatosaurus vs. Brontosaurus

An unregistered editor has repeatedly changed Apatosaurus to Brontosaurus. Yes, there is a long-running very minor dispute in paleontology over Apatosaurus vs. Brontosaurus. That tiny technical issue does not belong in this article. The source cited says Apatosaurus so Misplaced Pages says Apatosaurus. Changes contrary to the source will be reverted. Repeated changes contrary to the source will result in page protection and yeah, I'll have to both figuring out which of our problem editors this is. - SummerPhD 13:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

"Sharptooth" vs. "the Sharp-Tooth" and other tone issues

In the current plot summary, the T. Rex that killed Littlefoot's mother and follows the main characters is referred to as "Sharptooth". Because (to my recollection - admittedly it's been years since I watched this film) the T. Rex is never addressed directly, should it not be "the Sharp-Tooth"? Anything that the characters say would trump this, of course, but the latter term would avoid naming the T. Rex and more accurately reflect the feeling of dread associated with it. Compynerd255 (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

No, it is "Sharptooth", not "Sharp-Tooth". Hypnobrai (talk) 02:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Land Before Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160711085722/http://youngartistawards.org/pastnoms10.htm to http://youngartistawards.org/pastnoms10.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Movie language.

I think the movie is better described as an "English language" one then "American-Irish". The place the studios were located has more to do with economics then the director's imagination, but the language the viewer shares with the movie helps him/her comprehend the action. Mostly I don't think the studio's location has any bearing on the film's content, unless there's evidence that it does. What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberty5651 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Liberty5651: I think the talk page on MOS:FILM would be the better place to ask this. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

That, and describing it as an "English language" film obfuscates where it was made, considering as how there are several different countries on several continents that speaking English.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

That, and "English language" ignores the fact that it was translated into more then half a dozen different languages which I did not realize for a while. Liberty5651 (talk) 21:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

You're becoming a case of WP:ICANTHEARYOU -- you've gotten answers and explanations, but you seem to be preoccupied with only your opinion on a matter that has been solidified across the encyclopedia project. Please refer to the numerous answers you've been given on three separate talk pages and to WP:FILMLEDE as the governing protocol, namely the part that says "If the film's nationality is singularly defined by reliable sources (e.g., being called an American film), it should be identified in the opening sentence. If the nationality is not singular, cover the different national interests later in the lead section", which is consistent with the response you received from Erik at MOS:Film. JesseRafe (talk) 21:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

List of anachronisms, amateur paleontology, etc.

Articles about kids' movies and TV shows involving animals often attract editors wishing to add scientific information about various characters (species, time periods, etc.). Misplaced Pages, however, generally does not include this information as it is not part of the film/TV show itself and is not discussed in reliable sources.

More directly, this movie is about talking dinosaurs. If you are looking to this movie for accurate info on dinosaurs, nothing in Misplaced Pages will help you. - SummerPhD 15:56, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class Ireland articles
• Low-importance Ireland articles
• C-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
• All WikiProject Ireland pages
• C-Class film articles
• C-Class core film articles
• WikiProject Film core articles
• C-Class American cinema articles
• American cinema task force articles
• Core film articles supported by the American cinema task force
• C-Class Animated films articles
• Top-importance Animated films articles
• Animated films work group articles
• Core film articles supported by the animated films work group
• WikiProject Film articles
• C-Class Animation articles
• High-importance Animation articles
• C-Class Animation articles of High-importance
• C-Class American animation articles
• High-importance American animation articles
• American animation work group articles
• WikiProject Animation articles