Revision as of 14:56, 21 April 2018 editOknazevad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users106,357 edits →World Dice Day← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:12, 22 April 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,295,546 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Dice/Archive 1) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|old-user-1=Quadell|old-date-1=13:47, 29 September 2013|old-user-2=Greatpopcorn|old-date-2= 01:13, 13 November 2013}} | {{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|old-user-1=Quadell|old-date-1=13:47, 29 September 2013|old-user-2=Greatpopcorn|old-date-2= 01:13, 13 November 2013}} | ||
== history == | |||
There aren't mentions about ] ] (]) 13:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | == External links modified == |
Revision as of 00:12, 22 April 2018
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Dice was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Guild of Copy Editors | |||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070620035304/http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=5668§ionid=351020108 to http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/5668.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Dice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080501172614/http://www.gamesmuseum.uwaterloo.ca/Archives/Culin/Dice1893/dice.html to http://www.gamesmuseum.uwaterloo.ca/Archives/Culin/Dice1893/dice.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101141751/http://www.minitab.com/uploadedFiles/Shared_Resources/Documents/Articles/CentralLimitTheorem.pdf to http://www.minitab.com/uploadedFiles/Shared_Resources/Documents/Articles/CentralLimitTheorem.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528013233/http://www.aleakybos.ch/Properties%20of%20Dice.pdf to http://www.aleakybos.ch/Properties%20of%20Dice.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Average dice throw
Section 5.1.2 of the article states:
>>> A variation on the standard die is known as the "average" die. These are six-sided dice with sides numbered 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, which results in the same average result as a standard die (3.5 for a single die, 7 for a pair of dice), but have a narrower range of possible values (2 through 5 for one, 4 through 10 for a pair). They are used in some table-top wargames, where a narrower range of numbers is required. <<<
To roll a dice is a random event/process and in statistics, these events are not called average result, expected value would be the suitable/proper team. In short, to call it average result would be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Da Vinci Nanjing (talk • contribs) 14:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- That's not what the use means. It's not talking about likeliness of outcomes, which, but the actual average (arithmetic mean) of all the possible sums. The use of the technical term needs better explanation. oknazevad (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Oknazevad,
I don't agree.
The paragraph it not referring to the likelihood of outcomes. The likelihood for each number for throwing a dice is 1/n. For a dice n=6. So the probability is 1/6.
To roll a dice is in probability theory an event described by a uniform distribution. To find an average of a UD you have to sum up all possible outcomes and divide this by the count of outcomes:
n=6
1+2+3+4+5+6=21
21/6= 3.5
This average what you get is called expected value.
To get the expected value of throwing a dice in real you would have to roll the dice an infinite amount of throws than calculate the average of all throws.
It doesn't matter if a 6 sided dice has 1-6 on its sides or 2,3,3,4,4,5. The expected value for both variants of dices is 3.5.
Further, you state, the use of this technical term needs better explanation:
This means you agree it is the proper term, but it's too difficult to understand? If the term expected value needs a better explanation what about to change the term into a hyperlink referring to an online encyclopedia (e.g. Misplaced Pages) explaining it? Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
to Oknazevad:
I got to know this stuff in Quantitative Methods - Statistics at Koblenz University of Applied Science (Germany) the Faculty of Business and Management. Thanks to Prof. Dr. G.S.
Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Oknazevad,
you did not make any comment to my explanation: You did not write, I am wrong or I am right or somewhere in between. Your edit summary says:
No, the sum of the possible outcome values divided by the number of possible outcomes is an arithmetic mean, not an expected value. That's the point of the passage.
That's wrong, why? Look at my next-to-last post in the Talk section related to the article. Referring to your explanation, it all comes down to a random event. Additionally, you reverted my edit instead of doing a new one will deteriorate some of my edit statistics. It seems like, you try to tease me on purpose.
If you got the courage to challenge me, defuse my arguments.
Let's assume you throw a 6 sided dice: You could calculate the expected value before you throw the dice as every outcome got the same probability. You could calculate the average e.g. after you throw the dice 9 times:
2 4 3 2 3 3 6 2 3
Generated with the randbetween function from MS Excel 2013 The sum is 28 / 9 = 3.111111... The 3.111111... is the average. The 3.5 is the expected value, even if your average differentiates, you knew this figure even before you threw the dice. The paragraph doesn't state how often you would throw and the outcome so it is referring to the expected value.
Hereby I provide a source to calculate the expected value from a dice throw:
http://www.mathwords.com/e/expected_value.htm
Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- To be honest, I am having difficulty following your argument because of your grammar. Regardless, as I said in my edit summary, the sentence is about the name of the variant, which derives not from looking at the outcome of rolls, regardless of how many, but merely the average of the values of the faces, merely that (1+2+3+4+5+6)/6 is the same as (2+3+3+4+4+5)/6. There's no statistical probability involved, so any mention of expected outcomes is irrelevant. oknazevad (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
World Dice Day
I wonder if it would be interesting to add something about the World Dice Day, held on 4th december each year?
DrNoD (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Nah, too trivial. If every Misplaced Pages article mentioned it's honorary day that is not widely known it would make the encyclopedia look silly. oknazevad (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class board and table game articles
- Top-importance board and table game articles
- WikiProject Board and table games articles
- C-Class role-playing game articles
- High-importance role-playing game articles
- WikiProject Role-playing games articles
- C-Class Dungeons & Dragons articles
- Mid-importance Dungeons & Dragons articles
- C-Class Dungeons & Dragons articles of Mid-importance
- All Dungeons & Dragons articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors