| Revision as of 00:34, 4 May 2018 editMiacek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,481 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:28, 4 May 2018 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,567,300 editsm Substing templates: {{3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :{{ping|Miacek}} Resorting to personal attacks to get a user blocked is frowned upon ] (]) 00:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | :{{ping|Miacek}} Resorting to personal attacks to get a user blocked is frowned upon ] (]) 00:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| {{3rr}}.] ] 00:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->.] ] 00:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Miacek}} Grow up! ] (]) 00:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | :{{ping|Miacek}} Grow up! ] (]) 00:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 4 May 2018
So whose sock are you?Miacek (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Miacek: Resorting to personal attacks to get a user blocked is frowned upon Ringthrust (talk) 00:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly..Miacek (talk) 00:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Miacek: Grow up! Ringthrust (talk) 00:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Miacek (talk) 00:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)