Misplaced Pages

Hate groups and new religious movements: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:22, 13 December 2004 editZappaz (talk | contribs)5,934 editsNo edit summary  Revision as of 23:23, 13 December 2004 edit undoZappaz (talk | contribs)5,934 edits See alsoNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


==See also== ==See also==
*]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*]

Revision as of 23:23, 13 December 2004

Advocates who regard certain fringe religious organizations, new religious movements or (controversially) "cults" as spurious and condemn their methods, also call them "hate groups". For example, the prominent counter cult activist Anton Hein considers Scientology a hate group because that religious movement has, in his opinion, a long, documented history of hate and harassment activities, which—along with lying and deception—are condoned and encouraged in Scientology's own 'scriptures.' (See, for example, Scientology's Fair Game policy.)

In turn, a number of new religious movements have used the term "hate group" to label certain former members of these groups. Disaffected former members of these organizations have worked to expose what they believe is the "truth" about the groups in question, though the methods used by some of these former members have been known to be polemic, hostile and verbally abusive. Alleged cults and new religions have seized upon the hostile acts of their former members and cited them as examples of persecution and bigotry by these former members. Supporters of these groups have waged campaigns of their own to label former members as hate groups, even to the point where they publish literature and Web sites dedicated to attacking these disaffected persons.

CESNUR’s president Massimo Introvigne, writes in his article "So many evil things: Anti-cult terrorism via the Internet", that fringe and extreme anti-cult activism resort to tactics that may create a background favorable to extreme manifestations of discrimination and hate against individuals that belong to new religious movements. Critics of CESNUR, however, call Introvigne a cult apologist who defends harmful religious groups and cults. Somewhat in concurrence with Introvigne, professor Eileen Barker asserts that the controvery surrounding certain new religious movements can turn violent by a process called deviancy amplification spiral.

Elan Vital, an NRM and an organization that supports the work of Prem Rawat, labels its vocal critics that call themselves "Ex-Premies" a hate group, because it believes that their actions and expressions contains similar elements and characterizations as presented in Introvigne's article and question their character and motives as well as their tactics.

See also