Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:41, 11 May 2018

To submit a Personal Attack or Baseless Accusation, please click here.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

AR-15 talk

I had a feeling you'd be the one to respond to that, and thanks by the way, but as a suggestion, wouldn't atop & abot be more suitable than hat & hab? Just a thought... - WOLFchild 03:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Off topic?

Do you have the right editor? I asked that editor to not derail that thread with off-topic comments (which they were). I invited him to continue discussing his edits if he were willing, (but not in that thead), and of everything on that page, that is the one post you characterize as a "rant"? (kind of insulting). Why is it you are following my edits and posting these admin-like warnings and even hatting some in a 'clerking-type fashion? Can you explain this ongoing behavior of yours? Thank you - WOLFchild 04:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture. Legobot (talk) 04:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

This looks like campaigning

Dlthewave, I would be careful about edits like this ]. That discussion isn't a RfC and the members of the gun politics project are almost all sympathetic with inclusion of such material and at a rate far more so vs the participants we've seen at similar RfCs. Also, you didn't notify the more obvious Project Firearms. The article in question is clearly about a gun, not politics related to guns. I would ask that you either remove the notice or make it a RfC and go through the normal notification process.

I know you are doing this in good faith but this was one of my concerns with the gun politics project. My concern grew when I saw that the project tags weren't just added to obvious articles about gun politics (gun laws, stand your ground etc) but was extended to many articles about guns themselves. Edit: I just noticed that the M1911 article is of interest to three projects which weren't notified but not listed as "of interest" to the Gun Politic's project. Springee (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I will add the project tag.

It is up to project participants to decide which topics are within scope, and we've determined that criminal use is within the realm of gun politics. I find it useful and appropriate to include a list of open discussions on the project page. –dlthewave ☎ 16:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I would suggest you notify all the projects or none. Like I said, when we look at the list of Gun Politic's participants I think the prevailing POV is clear. Yes, people have made a similar claim about Project Firearms but it does have a much larger list of editors. Please be sure to notify the other projects if you wish to keep the notification at Project Gun Politics. It should eliminate the appearance of favoritism or campaigning. Springee (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I would also ask that you do the same with this notification. ]. Springee (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm going to keep it as is for now, but I'm open to discussing it if uninvolved editors will weigh in. –dlthewave ☎ 17:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I would suggest asking... I'm not sure where. The AR-15 discussion isn't important enough to bother with but the M1911 discussion hits on a core issue that has been the subject of a number of RfCs etc. Notifying a single project that you created and is followed almost exclusively by editors who historically share your POV on articles looks really bad to me. I know you aren't doing this in bad faith but the results may be the same. Springee (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll leave it to you to raise your concerns at the appropriate forum. –dlthewave ☎ 18:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Existentialism Is a Humanism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Existentialism Is a Humanism. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk page

As I have already ask you nicely, please keep all comment to article talk pages. You can be sanction for violating this request. I will let this one slide, but if you violate this again I will bring it to the attention of the admins on a noticeboard. Thank you. -72bikers (talk) 14:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I have not read whatever you placed on my talk page. I am now going to take this to a noticeboard for sanction against you. You clearly do not understand Wiki policy of user talk pages. You have been clearly warned many times to not post on my personal talk page and keep comments to article talk pages ,. -72bikers (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I've taken this issue to ANi so here is the notification. Legacypac (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)