| Revision as of 20:20, 15 May 2018 editSir Joseph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,854 edits →JerusalemTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:13, 16 May 2018 edit undoSomedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,469 edits →Jerusalem: CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | ||
| :My mistake, I thought it was 1 revert per 24 h. It did not violate BRD. User:Debresser has reverted it back to its original standing. -- ] (]) 10:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:13, 16 May 2018
Is there anybody in there?
WHOA!
CLICK HERE to start a new post
Zlatan Ibrahimović
Please see the Talk page about some of the points raised. In order to remove the inaccurate additions, some of your formatting changes were also lost and I apologize for that, but they can be easily restored if you will. DA1 (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Jerusalem
Hi, your revert violated DS and is subject to block. Please revert and discuss. (IT also violated BRD, but Jerusalem is under DS and you can be blocked for your edit.) Here's the specific clause, "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit." Sir Joseph 20:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC) to clarify:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- My mistake, I thought it was 1 revert per 24 h. It did not violate BRD. User:Debresser has reverted it back to its original standing. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)