| Revision as of 17:19, 24 May 2018 editJoshua Jonathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers107,213 edits →Edit-warring: add cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:10, 27 May 2018 edit undoMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors86,533 edits →Jesus: Please don't edit-war to ensure your preferred version of an article. Instead, add a citation to a reliable source that supports your change, or follow WP:BRD and start a discussion on the talk page.Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Blanking your talkpages is not a good sign... You're lucky that you made your reverts in a series on edits; this makes it count as only two. ] -] 07:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | Blanking your talkpages is not a good sign... You're lucky that you made your reverts in a series on edits; this makes it count as only two. ] -] 07:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| : three... In which you removed sourced info, and mistakenly stated that some info was incorrectly attributed to Porter. This was . ] -] 16:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | : three... In which you removed sourced info, and mistakenly stated that some info was incorrectly attributed to Porter. This was . ] -] 16:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Jesus == | |||
| I noticed your two attempts to add material to ] (] and ]). Unfortunately I had to revert them, because they are not supported by a reliable source, nor by the nearby sources that preceded your edit. Please note that articles on religious topics can be contentious, and you'll need to hew to the strictest standards of ] by always providing ] to ] along with page numbers for any of the changes you make. Otherwise, any editor can challenge and remove a change per the ]. | |||
| Don't simply revert in order to reinstall your preferred version of the text, as you risk being called out for ], and I see that you have been warned a few times about this already. So you really don't want to do that. So, what next? Per ], once you've made a bold edit and been reverted; the next step is to raise a discussion at the ] about the edit you wish to make. Alternatively, if you can find an unimpeachable source that supports that change you wish to make, simply do your edit again, and add the reference after it. Thanks, ] (]) 07:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:10, 27 May 2018
Edit-warring
Blanking your talkpages is not a good sign... You're lucky that you made your reverts in a series on edits; this makes it count as only two. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's three... In which you removed sourced info, and mistakenly stated that some info was incorrectly attributed to Porter. This was already corrected. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Jesus
I noticed your two attempts to add material to Jesus (here and here). Unfortunately I had to revert them, because they are not supported by a reliable source, nor by the nearby sources that preceded your edit. Please note that articles on religious topics can be contentious, and you'll need to hew to the strictest standards of verifiability by always providing footnotes to reliable sources along with page numbers for any of the changes you make. Otherwise, any editor can challenge and remove a change per the verifiability guideline.
Don't simply revert in order to reinstall your preferred version of the text, as you risk being called out for edit-warring, and I see that you have been warned a few times about this already. So you really don't want to do that. So, what next? Per WP:BRD, once you've made a bold edit and been reverted; the next step is to raise a discussion at the talk page about the edit you wish to make. Alternatively, if you can find an unimpeachable source that supports that change you wish to make, simply do your edit again, and add the reference after it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)