Revision as of 20:34, 28 October 2006 editBakasuprman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,844 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:37, 28 October 2006 edit undoPavel Vozenilek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,218 editsm →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small>] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small>] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. NN, spam, astroturfing. ] 20:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:37, 28 October 2006
Devajyoti Ray
speedy delete - no notability and i speculate this was created by the subject of the article (based on his creation of articles on his own artwork). give me a break! 4.18GB 13:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as spam. No particular claims of notability, and creator's contributions seem to consist of spamming his name and website across every article they can think of. Update: see also In Despair. Pseudorealism seems to be related. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- Dont assign motives. He has been covered in many mainstream articles.Bakaman Bakatalk 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman Bakatalk 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. NN, spam, astroturfing. Pavel Vozenilek 20:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)