Revision as of 19:40, 26 May 2018 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,288 edits →May 2018: still welcome back after the block← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:27, 27 May 2018 edit undoOfficer781 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,368 edits →Come back: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
*Mr KEBAB, I've removed your intemperate post and revoked talkpage access during the remainder of the block. Exploding over a block is something I have understanding of — a block is a shock — and you're still welcome back after it. ] | ] 19:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC). | *Mr KEBAB, I've removed your intemperate post and revoked talkpage access during the remainder of the block. Exploding over a block is something I have understanding of — a block is a shock — and you're still welcome back after it. ] | ] 19:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC). | ||
== Come back == | |||
I was just editing and came across this. Am not sure of the background but I figure a fight got raw after awhile. Just penning this to let you know I appreciate your contributions here and would like you to come back. I would think a few others who worked with you do too. Had a fair share of raw arguments in real life so I guess it's kind of normal. I just feel that if Misplaced Pages loses you just because of this it's quite sad.--] (]) 13:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:27, 27 May 2018
Archives |
A small request
When you add a reply, can you keep the section link (/* ... */
) in the edit summary? It makes it easier to track conversations in the watchlist and revision history. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
So... could you do that or not? JFYI, what I usually do is press Tab ↹ → when the focus is on the edit box and then enter e.g. "re", then hit Enter to publish the changes. Nardog (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Nardog: I'll write that somewhere, thanks. I actually have no idea why I'm doing that, maybe I just want my edit summaries to be shorter. Mr KEBAB (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for using the "thanks" function for harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | talk 18:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Bishonen | talk 19:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Mr KEBAB, I've removed your intemperate post and revoked talkpage access during the remainder of the block. Exploding over a block is something I have understanding of — a block is a shock — and you're still welcome back after it. Bishonen | talk 19:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC).
Come back
I was just editing and came across this. Am not sure of the background but I figure a fight got raw after awhile. Just penning this to let you know I appreciate your contributions here and would like you to come back. I would think a few others who worked with you do too. Had a fair share of raw arguments in real life so I guess it's kind of normal. I just feel that if Misplaced Pages loses you just because of this it's quite sad.--Officer781 (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)