Revision as of 02:40, 29 May 2018 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,221 edits →Warned for edit warring at Jesus: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:47, 29 May 2018 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,221 edits →Warned for edit warring at Jesus: Not really archiving, in the accepted senseNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You've been '''warned''' for edit warring per the result of . If you revert the article again (before getting consensus on the talk page) you are risking a block. The steps of ] are open to you. Thanks, ] (]) 02:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC) | You've been '''warned''' for edit warring per the result of . If you revert the article again (before getting consensus on the talk page) you are risking a block. The steps of ] are open to you. Thanks, ] (]) 02:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Perhaps isn't the best one to use when all you are doing is *erasing* the past messages from your talk, and not saving them anywhere else. When the posts removed are mostly complaints then I suppose this is understandable. There might be a way to receive fewer complaints if you would change your approach to editing Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 02:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:47, 29 May 2018
Warned for edit warring at Jesus
You've been warned for edit warring per the result of a complaint about your edits at WP:AN3. If you revert the article again (before getting consensus on the talk page) you are risking a block. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps the term 'archiving' isn't the best one to use when all you are doing is *erasing* the past messages from your talk, and not saving them anywhere else. When the posts removed are mostly complaints then I suppose this is understandable. There might be a way to receive fewer complaints if you would change your approach to editing Misplaced Pages. EdJohnston (talk) 02:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)