Misplaced Pages

List of states with limited recognition: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:17, 30 October 2006 view sourceKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 editsm moved List of unrecognized entities to List of unrecognized countries: DON'T do unilateral pagemoves← Previous edit Revision as of 20:26, 30 October 2006 view source 172.200.34.104 (talk) →Partially recognized states with de facto control over their territory: linking TurkeyNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*{{flagicon|ROC}} The ''']''' ('''R.O.C'''), which governs only ] and some ] since losing the ] in ], lost most of its diplomatic recognition and ] to the ] in ], ] by ] and now is currently ] as well as ] of the ]. It conducts '']'' (in all but name) relations with most countries through ''de facto'' embassies such as the ]. (''See ]''). *{{flagicon|ROC}} The ''']''' ('''R.O.C'''), which governs only ] and some ] since losing the ] in ], lost most of its diplomatic recognition and ] to the ] in ], ] by ] and now is currently ] as well as ] of the ]. It conducts '']'' (in all but name) relations with most countries through ''de facto'' embassies such as the ]. (''See ]'').


*{{flagicon|Northern Cyprus}} The ''']''' was set up in the northern part of the island of ] after an invasion by Turkish forces in ], following a Greek Cypriot coup, which, backed by the ], overthrew president ]. TRNC declared independence in ] and has been recognized only by ]. In ], its territory was accepted ] into the ] as part of the ], though it remains ] outside the EU. *{{flagicon|Northern Cyprus}} The ''']''' was set up in the northern part of the island of ] after an ] from the ] in ], following a Greek Cypriot coup, which, backed by the ], overthrew president ]. TRNC declared independence in ] and has been recognized only by ]. In ], its territory was accepted ] into the ] as part of the ], though it remains ] outside the EU.


==Unrecognized states with de facto control over their territory== ==Unrecognized states with de facto control over their territory==

Revision as of 20:26, 30 October 2006

Several geo-political entities in the world have no general international recognition, but they are de facto sovereign states.

Most are subnational regions with an ethno-national identity of its own that have "broken off" (i.e. separated themselves) from their original parent state, and hence they are commonly referred to as "break-away" states. Some of these entities are in effect internally self-governing protectorates that enjoy military protection and informal diplomatic representation abroad through another state to prevent its forced reincorporation into its original state.

Partially recognized states with de facto control over their territory

United Nations member states that are only partially recognized by the totality of the other UN members are listed here

Unrecognized states with de facto control over their territory

Unrecognized states with partial control over their territory

Partially recognized states largely under military occupation

Internationally administered territory

Partially unrecognized states

The following states are all recognised by the majority of the world's sovereign states. Barring the Holy See, they are all members of the United Nations. They all conduct relations with the majority of the world's nations. However, some of them are not recognized by certain countries. These partially unrecognized states are:

Historic unrecognized or partially recognized states with de facto control over their territory

Europe


Asia

Africa

Americas

Oceania

Historic unrecognized or partially recognized governments with de facto control over their territory

These regimes had control over the territory of a country for which most other states recognized a different government as being the legitimate government:

Notes

  1. Bilateral and Multilateral Relations of the Holy See
  2. Goldstein, Melvyn C., A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951, University of California Press, 1989, pp. 812-813

See also

Categories: