| Revision as of 21:34, 30 October 2006 editElomis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users861 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:34, 30 October 2006 edit undoElomis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users861 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete''' No sources whatsoever, no evidence of ]. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the ] article. --] 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' No sources whatsoever, no evidence of ]. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the ] article. --] 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' as per Utcursch - move anything not fancruft to ]. | *'''Strong Delete''' as per Utcursch - move anything not fancruft to ]. ] 21:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 30 October 2006
Pseudorealism in Indian Art
delete - see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Devajyoti Ray 4.18GB 23:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Devajyoti Ray is notable but this is probably cruft.Bakaman Bakatalk 15:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Devajyoti Ray might be notable enough to deserve an article, but this is not. Merge any salvagable content to Devajyoti Ray. utcursch | talk 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. See Devajyoti Ray AfD discussion for details. Pavel Vozenilek 03:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman Bakatalk 01:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No sources whatsoever, no evidence of WP:Notability. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the Devajyoti Ray article. --Shirahadasha 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as per Utcursch - move anything not fancruft to Devajyoti Ray. Elomis 21:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)