Revision as of 09:21, 24 June 2018 editGizzyCatBella (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,604 edits →Recent editsTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit |
Revision as of 09:30, 24 June 2018 edit undoIcewhiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,036 edits →Recent editsNext edit → |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
I've this edit, which restored the 27 August 2017 version, restoring the stable version from March 2018. This version is very poorly sourced, and misrepresents the sources it uses - many of which do not cover Stawiski and/or do not contain the stmts attributed to them. Please discuss here.] (]) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
I've this edit, which restored the 27 August 2017 version, restoring the stable version from March 2018. This version is very poorly sourced, and misrepresents the sources it uses - many of which do not cover Stawiski and/or do not contain the stmts attributed to them. Please discuss here.] (]) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
: What was poorly sourced? Could you elaborate?] (]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
: What was poorly sourced? Could you elaborate?] (]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:: {{ping|GizzyCatBella}} I strongly suggest you self revert - you've restored several sources that do not refer to the town (e.g. Rossino - who simply doesn't say what you are restoring), and have introduced highly defamatory and counter-factual information in Misplaced Pages's voice. The stable version is from 19 March. I will be taking this to AE if you don't self revert.] (]) 09:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
I added some citation tags to the article. Reference number 4 is a blog. Can it be considered a credible source? Furthermore, the conclusions drawn from this blog entry are only loosely based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.105.203 (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)