| Revision as of 19:33, 16 July 2018 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,804 edits →Banner shell: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:48, 16 July 2018 edit undoCa2james (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 edits →Banner shell: ?Next edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| {{u|Atsme}}, I don't know why you me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. ] (]) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | {{u|Atsme}}, I don't know why you me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. ] (]) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :My edit summaries are self-explanatory. <sup>]]]</sup> 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | :My edit summaries are self-explanatory. <sup>]]]</sup> 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::Sure, except for the one I linked above which said: "Undid revision 850275608 by Ca2james (talk) added another project - please discuss on TP". So here I am, discussing, but I don't understand why you said to do this and I'm asking for clarity. Did you mean something like "discuss on talk page before reverting?" That's not what your words say, so in the future if that is your meaning, please do say that in your edit summary so that your words match your intent. For the present, could you please explain what you wanted me to discuss? ] (]) 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 16 July 2018
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocacy ducks page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Banner shell
I'd removed the banner shell because at that time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect).
Atsme, I don't know why you told me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. Ca2james (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- My edit summaries are self-explanatory. 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, except for the one I linked above which said: "Undid revision 850275608 by Ca2james (talk) added another project - please discuss on TP". So here I am, discussing, but I don't understand why you said to do this and I'm asking for clarity. Did you mean something like "discuss on talk page before reverting?" That's not what your words say, so in the future if that is your meaning, please do say that in your edit summary so that your words match your intent. For the present, could you please explain what you wanted me to discuss? Ca2james (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)