Revision as of 00:48, 17 July 2018 editTroy von Tempest (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,321 edits →Blood Order: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:38, 20 June 2024 edit undoShiningEyes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users658 edits Cleanup.Next edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*] | *] | ||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- ] 15:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- ] 15:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Argentinian to Argentine == | |||
Hi ShiningEyes. Thanks for setting the ] straight. Shows my regretable lack of knowledge about Argentina. Cheers.--] 22:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
==]== | ==]== | ||
Hi, I saw you are interested in the project. So I just wanted to let you know that I am actively trying to revive it. See post on ]. ] 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC) | Hi, I saw you are interested in the project. So I just wanted to let you know that I am actively trying to revive it. See post on ]. ] 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Re: Argentine vandal== | |||
I will, no problem. Homever, it seems that another edit war has started there, so I'll ask the administrator that protected 'em for another protection. Cheers. --] 01:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== SIDE == | |||
Gracias por contribuir a la wiki de la SIDE. Me gustaría mucho si pudieras contribuir re escribiendo el texto un poco y wikificando las cosas. Así se le puede sacar la Cleanup tag que tiene desde hace meses. | |||
Vengo escribiendo el artículo desde el año pasado, y practicamente lo escribi en su totalidad. Hoy por hoy es la mejor fuente de información sobre la Secretaría. | |||
Si querés ver cosas que faltan, fijate en ]. O podés ayudar a terminar la traducción al español: en | |||
--] 18:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Lemas en latín y esas cosas == | |||
Disculpame si pareció que te estaba contestando a vos; indenté mal el mensaje... Saludos, ] says '']'' 18:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 15:38, 20 June 2024
Welcome!
Hello, ShiningEyes, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 15:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
WP:MOTTO
Hi, I saw you are interested in the project. So I just wanted to let you know that I am actively trying to revive it. See post on Misplaced Pages talk:Community Portal. Renata 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Community Justice
This is a notification reminding you all, especially councillors, that we are having a meeting where we will try to review progress so far and make a few decisions.
This meeting will be held on a wikipage, and well end on Saturday 15th April.
You can partake in the meeting here.
Thank you,
Computerjoe's talk 17:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC) (Chairman of WP:CJ.)
Message delivered through AWB.
Misplaced Pages:Community Justice/Elections
As Misplaced Pages:Community Justice have over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.
If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourslef, and a statement, to Misplaced Pages:Community Justice/Elections.
Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Misplaced Pages:Community Justice/Elections.
Thank you,
Computerjoe's talk 20:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
CJ election reminder
Hi ShiningEyes
I noticed that you are not registered for voting or nomination in the CJ elections, and would like to remind everyone that all Candidates Must Submit Their Statement By April 23rd. Voting will begin April 24th, and end May 1st. More details on how to nominate yourself can be found HERE.
I hope to see you at the elections!
• The Giant Puffin • 20:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Template:Talkheader
Please see Template talk:Talkheader#Colours, thanks/wangi 08:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Templated Userboxes being "saved" by misunderstanding of process
Your comments at Deletion review are right on target, but I don't think people "get it" about Templated Userboxes. They see the attempt to move them from Template space as an attack on their "favorite" box, which is "funny," after all. I think mentioning "not funny" in the nominations skewed the discussion. So did posting Tfd notices on the boxes, which proves the point that they are being used for social networking, in violation of WP policy. Others seem willfully ignoring polices and guidelines. Anyway, I had to say this to someone. How disheartening that these apparently will all be saved in Template space, since all I see is "keep, keep, keep." <sigh> - Nhprman 20:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
(I moved this because it got caught up in the newsletter, below. Sorry. Nhprman 20:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC))
Community Justice Newsletter
Community Justice Newsletter
|
Language icon
Hi, please join the discussion at Template talk:Languageicon rather than edit warring on the template. Thanks, Henry 16:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Web Cite
Hi I notice you changed 'retrived' back to 'last accessed' on cite web template. I am dissucssing if it needs to be changed on the Template_talk:Cite_web#Accessdate, would you be intrested? Rex the first 23:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
substing
Unfortunately, {{cite web}} is not suitable for substing (please consider voting for bugzilla:2777 to fix this). May I ask you to clean up this? Thanks! --Ligulem 18:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Concordia newsletter
Concordia Newsletter
Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.
Concordia is an organization of editors on Misplaced Pages that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.
We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.
Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Misplaced Pages:Concordia/Do Not Spam.
Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel .
- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Languageicon
The discussion is still going on... You might want to drop in. --Cat out 19:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Concordia Newsletter
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
Help out now!
- Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
- Give people the Civility Barnstar.
- Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
- Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
- Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
Decision Making
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.
The Latin-American Misplaced Pages Meeting
| |
Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America. You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Misplaced Pages represent 40% of the internet access.With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting? Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America. The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET). |
Tosão (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Blood Order
Hello ShiningEyes!
I'm sorry to bother you, I see you contributed to the Blood Order article. I am having some difficulty with an editor who know claims that the Blood Order and the Golden Party Badge are "trivial" awards and are not to be linked to in other articles. As you contributed to the Blood Order article, I'm hoping you don't consider it a trivial award? My problem is that I don't see what is wrong with linking to a stand-alone article, like the Blood Order, in another article, such as the Ernst Röhm article, which I've been adding content to. I don't see what function a stand-alone article serves if you are not allowed to provide a link to it in another article? I also don't see how it is now, based on one editor's say-so, a "trivial" award? I have asked him why I can't link to a stand-alone article but have received no reply, other than it is now menial and not permitted to be linked. This has happened to me on many occasions, with many awards and decorations. I have asked for a list of so-called "trivial" awards so I know not to link to them again, have my added content deleted and wait for the inevitable aggressive warning (see my talk page). Again, no such list has been made available by this editor, so what do I do? Just add links to stand-alone articles and hope for the best or just stop adding links to stand-alone articles? The thing is, I have added many awards and decorations to many articles, but they still stand, so I'm at a loss as to why it's ok to provide links in some articles but not the ones that the editor in question is monitoring. I'm not asking you to take sides or anything like that, what I would greatly appreciate is your input on the Ernst Röhm talk page. If you feel stand-alone articles are not to be linked, fair enough. If you think it's ok, it would be helpful for the consensus of editors ruling on this. If you also don't view the Blood Order or the Golden Party Badge or any others as "trivial", which I'm thinking you don't as you took the time to add to the article, it would be greatly appreciated if you could say so. I just don't see the problem with linking to stand-alone articles. If they're not link-worthy, what function do they serve?
Thank you for your time