Revision as of 18:48, 19 July 2018 edit2604:6000:cc80:eb00:79e5:3ad7:bda6:f78 (talk) →Constructive Edits← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:51, 19 July 2018 edit undoJC7V7DC5768 (talk | contribs)23,252 edits →Constructive EditsNext edit → | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
Explain to me why they are not constructive edits. I am trying to include a reference to the importance of Seth to the religious tradition of Mandaeanism which only has one other mention elsewhere. How is it not constructive? | Explain to me why they are not constructive edits. I am trying to include a reference to the importance of Seth to the religious tradition of Mandaeanism which only has one other mention elsewhere. How is it not constructive? | ||
] (]) 18:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC) | ] (]) 18:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
::: Exact edits you made today were reverted by an administrator just a few days ago (another ip made the same edits). So obviously if he thinks they are unconstructive they are. ] (]) 18:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:51, 19 July 2018
This is JC7V7DC5768's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
July 14 2018
Sorry what? Where? I'm confused. Why an only warning? unsigned comment by AmberPétursson 14 July 2018
- Hi, I am sorry you are currently blocked. I saw your first edit on your user talk which was offensive ,then I saw you make a big change to an important article but you didn't cite it, I saw some other edits which 5 albert square cited in your unblock request. Together I thought you weren't there but I had doubts so I let other editors/admins deal with it. Thank you for your commentsJC7V7DC5768 (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Foster White has been accepted
Eric Foster White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
SweetCanadianMullet (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Eric Foster White
Hi there! I noticed you removed the notability tag on the article Eric Foster White. I disagree that enough improvements have been made to justify the removal of the tag. Instead of re-adding it, and causing an edit war, I wanted to check with you to get a better idea of how this person satisfies WP:NMUSIC. Thanks! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 16:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Susan Mikula has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Mikula. Thanks! Strikerforce 14:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Mikula (July 18)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Strikerforce was: Personal life section needs references. I'm also still not entirely confident that the subject meets notability guidelines for anything other than being the partner of someone else. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susan Mikula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Susan Mikula, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, JC7V7DC5768! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Strikerforce 16:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Forced Alliance (July 18)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forced Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Forced Alliance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Susan Mikula has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Mikula. Thanks! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for July 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bob Glauber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Walsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
July 19
My edit was not a test. 2604:6000:CC80:EB00:79E5:3AD7:BDA6:F78 (talk) 18:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Constructive Edits
Explain to me why they are not constructive edits. I am trying to include a reference to the importance of Seth to the religious tradition of Mandaeanism which only has one other mention elsewhere. How is it not constructive? 2604:6000:CC80:EB00:79E5:3AD7:BDA6:F78 (talk) 18:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Exact edits you made today were reverted by an administrator just a few days ago (another ip made the same edits). So obviously if he thinks they are unconstructive they are. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)