Misplaced Pages

Talk:London After Midnight (band): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:44, 2 November 2006 edit200.122.45.7 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:27, 13 November 2006 edit undoCambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators253,396 edits {{Wikiproject Rock music}}Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikiproject Rock music}}

==possible copyvio== ==possible copyvio==
A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at ] which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. ] 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC) A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at ] which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. ] 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:27, 13 November 2006

WikiProject iconRock music Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

possible copyvio

A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the band's history page on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. Cantara 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

What's your concern? The guy who does the web work for LAM wrote that article which was used with permission. The text was ok'd by the band to be presented here on Misplaced Pages.

Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found . Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! Cantara 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

not exactly npov

what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -supine 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I edited out the biased stuff.

It really reads like a Press Realease.

Categories: