Revision as of 09:02, 2 November 2006 edit62.147.86.249 (talk) Answering disingenuous lie, followup to User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism and User_talk:DVD_R_W#Stop_your_revert-vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:17, 2 November 2006 edit undoDweller (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Oversighters, Administrators55,876 edits solution providedNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:* ] | :* ] | ||
: -- ] 09:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | : -- ] 09:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
I've proposed a solution that is simple at ]. --] 10:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:17, 2 November 2006
Your edits to Alice
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages, as you did in Alice. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 03:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nonsensical accusation, actual violation of WP:REVERT and WP:FAITH, follow up and explication at User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism
- 62.147.39.202 04:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages. It is considered spamming, and Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. DVD+ R/W 06:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- A disingenuous lie: you previously participated in User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism and thus know already why this item is addem to the dab page and why it's legit, and you didn't provide any rebuke to my arrguments there. So you have no plausible denial to pretend here and now not knowing it's WP:MOSDAB and WP:NOTABILITY. More at:
- -- 62.147.86.249 09:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I've proposed a solution that is simple at User talk:Dina. --Dweller 10:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)