Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:20, 16 August 2018 view sourceMusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,003 edits Bot clerking: found previously declined requests (2 open requests remaining)← Previous edit Revision as of 12:10, 16 August 2018 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,003 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (2 open requests remaining)Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
</noinclude>}} </noinclude>}}
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.-->

====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Funplussmart}}
:I spend a lot of my time on Misplaced Pages reverting vandalism and other violations of Misplaced Pages policy. I think having Rollback will help me a lot in my efforts to keep this site clean from vandals and trolls. ] (]) 21:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
::{{done}} I have spot-checked your contributions, and those of your reverts that I checked were all correct. ] (]) 12:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====

Revision as of 12:10, 16 August 2018

Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right. More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:Tulsi Bhagat

Namaste ! As stated by the revoker, I'm here to let you know that I have some free time from my busy schedule & I'm active a bit against vandals these days and the slow internet connection here in Nepal prevents loading Twinkle Gadget which upsets me most of the time. Honestly, I've acknowledged my mistakes (Running sock farms in past year for which i have been globally locked). Actually, My intention wasn't bad & haven't yet misused any of my permissions or the associated tools. I apology from my inner core of the heart for my bad(s) and lastly i would like to request you to re-grant me the revoked permission(s) (If i can be trusted a bit) which will be quite helpful for my anti-vandalism task. Thanks for reading my request ! Kind Regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm inclined to grant this, but given the history with the global lock, etc, I'm going to ping Ajraddatz to confirm that there is no reason to believe this account is/was compromised, as was originally stated in the unlock request. Vanamonde (talk) 12:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed, the account is/was not compromised, and to the best of my knowledge has not returned to previous disruptive behaviour. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
While Vanamonde may be ready to give this back, normally when we allow a sockmaster back in at English Misplaced Pages, we ask to know about all accounts that were ever used. There is nothing easily linked in your request which explains what happened a year and a half ago. Could you please provide this? I also do understand your a sysop at two other wikis. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
@DeltaQuad: Hope it explains everything (I want to forget all this. Please, forgive me.). Thanks for your consideration ! Kind Regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for being open about the issue. I'll take a look a little later. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
The socking issue looks like a mess. I would try to make sure you keep on the good side while you are here. I have reviewed your recent reverts for consideration as I would with anyone else. Can you explain why you are only selectively warning people? Also you only have been back for a week, racking up edits. How can we be sure you remember policies with only being back a week? -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
It's fine. Thanks for reviewing my recent reverts. I would say, It's my bad that I'm selectively warning people. I'm afraid to make any other fault. Hoping this uncontroversial. I'll try to recover my bad. Actually, racking up edits depend on my real life leisure time. The more i have the free time & the more i will be involved. Also, This is the time i have fascinated here on en.wiki to contribute. I assure you that I still remember the policies. Since, I'm a Sysop at two other wikis & also a Rollbacker at Commons. If you have any additional questions or concerns, Please feel free to ask. Regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

User:LovSLif

I have seen many edit wars and vandalism among the users who modify the spaces specifically with the Indian articles which I actively monitor. Request you to grant me the acess to more effectively manage and maintain the peace By LovSLif (talk) 03:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot 03:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done There is no way that rollback can be used to "maintain the peace" in edit wars and is fundamentally against the nature of the user right. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

User:Knightrises10

I have been fighting vandalism from quote some time. My previous request was rejected for Indid not reach the criteria and had only a few edits at that time. However, now I have learned a lot about vandalism, good faith edits and other policies. I hope to get the rights to assist me. Thanks, Knightrises10 (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Knightrises10 (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days () and has 185 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 08:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done You are sparingly warning users about the reverts you are making, and you also missed oversightable content in a recent revert you made. You also don't seem to be following swarm's advice as you applied for this after you were declined for PCR. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
@DeltaQuad: I just checked the previous declined request as it wasn't in my watchlist. I'm looking forward to the counter vandalism academy. However, if I revert vandalism by an IP user, should i warn them too? Thanks, Knightrises10 (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, you need to be warning everyone. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

User:JC7V7DC5768

Hi, I want rollback for so I can fight vandalism more efficiently . Rollback would help me undo fast blatant vandalism. But i would put 100 percent care into using it per guidelines for it. I have studies the Rollback page for about a week and have grasped the ins and out of it.

However, I would only use rollback to revert blatant vandalism. For consecutive edits that are edits that violate Misplaced Pages's policies that aren't blatant vandalism, I will just click 'edit' and remove the edits manually (to the way they were before those non vandalism but still bad edits were made).

I would never use rollback to undue anything but blatant obvious vandalism, so using it an 'edit war' would never occur.

Using Rollback would also benefit me in that I could use Huggle which would only benefit me fighting vandalism even more.

I always mark in my edit summaries clearly and in user talk pages of editors who I revert clearly and whether the edit that I reverted is vandalism, tests, unsourced ,commentary, non neutral POV edit(s), MOS issues etc. I use all the warning templates so I am as clear as I can be to the user that I am warning so they can know what they did wrong and how to change it for the better .I am not perfect and I would be more than willing to have rollback for a trial period if you feel it is needed. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 01:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot 01:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)