Revision as of 22:03, 7 November 2006 editPanarjedde (talk | contribs)3,432 edits {{npa2}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:10, 7 November 2006 edit undoDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 edits moron spammed my talkpageNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
2. I am quite familiar with the Damned's music from all stages of their career, and have seen them live several times. There are times when their music had both punk and goth influences. Their latest album, ] is a perfect example of an record that includes both goth and punk influences. Calling them simply a "rock band" serves no purpose, because there are two specific genres that they are associated with. Also, if you check the article, the "goth" link directs to ], so your complaint that goth is not a genre of music is moot. The only reason I took ''rock'' off the end of ''punk'' and ''goth'' is that another editor complained that ]/] looked "too messy." As for your claim of "consensus", that is not true. The article said ]/] for a very long time, until another editor changed it and you backed him up. That editor has also changed at least one aricle to say a band is simply "rock" when that clearly is not the case. ] 19:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | 2. I am quite familiar with the Damned's music from all stages of their career, and have seen them live several times. There are times when their music had both punk and goth influences. Their latest album, ] is a perfect example of an record that includes both goth and punk influences. Calling them simply a "rock band" serves no purpose, because there are two specific genres that they are associated with. Also, if you check the article, the "goth" link directs to ], so your complaint that goth is not a genre of music is moot. The only reason I took ''rock'' off the end of ''punk'' and ''goth'' is that another editor complained that ]/] looked "too messy." As for your claim of "consensus", that is not true. The article said ]/] for a very long time, until another editor changed it and you backed him up. That editor has also changed at least one aricle to say a band is simply "rock" when that clearly is not the case. ] 19:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Warning == | |||
Never remove tags from pages. If you want, add <nowiki>{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}</nowiki>, but do not remove the image.--] 20:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Image:Bojinov.jpg == | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
# Go to ] and edit it to add {{]}} | |||
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. --] 20:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Image:59040.jpg == | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
# Go to ] and edit it to add {{]}} | |||
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. --] 20:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Image:LeccePromoShot.jpg == | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
# Go to ] and edit it to add {{]}} | |||
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. --] 20:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Read tags == | |||
It says: | |||
:"If you believe that a free replacement image could not be reasonably found or created, please add the following to this page: ''Do not remove this tag prior to that time.''" | |||
--] 21:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{npa2}} |
Revision as of 22:10, 7 November 2006
| ||
|
Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.
Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.
Please feel free to leave a new message!
Just curious about the edit to ThouShaltNot. They seem to fit and be marketed pretty well within goth circles. Thanks. Amber388 20:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Unfounded accusations
You obviously don't know the meanings of vandalism or trolling, or you would not have accused me of them. I deleted your sentence in pop punk because it doesn't really make sense, and it is written as if it is an objective fact, when it is really just your opinion. The whole purpose of that section is to point out that there is a definition of pop pun, that is different from the main definition, and your sentence doesn't seem to add anything useful. I reverted the opening sentence of The Damned article because they are not simply a "rock band". They are specifically a punk rock and goth rock band. And despite your assertion, they have in fact been both at the same time, including when they've toured in the last few years, and when they were in their crossover period. Spylab 17:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Reply to your reply
1) That is already implied in the title and explanation of the the section. Your sentence was redundent and unclearly written. They are not unrelated; the 1970s bands had a huge influence the later bands. Without the 1970s bands there would be no pop punk.
2. I am quite familiar with the Damned's music from all stages of their career, and have seen them live several times. There are times when their music had both punk and goth influences. Their latest album, Grave Disorder is a perfect example of an record that includes both goth and punk influences. Calling them simply a "rock band" serves no purpose, because there are two specific genres that they are associated with. Also, if you check the article, the "goth" link directs to goth rock, so your complaint that goth is not a genre of music is moot. The only reason I took rock off the end of punk and goth is that another editor complained that punk rock/goth rock looked "too messy." As for your claim of "consensus", that is not true. The article said punk rock/goth rock for a very long time, until another editor changed it and you backed him up. That editor has also changed at least one aricle to say a band is simply "rock" when that clearly is not the case. Spylab 19:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)